Table 2.

ETELM-IP results

ETELM-IP statement	Median score (on a 7 point likert scale with 7 as strongly agree and 1 as strongly disagree)	IQR
Instructions provided a good introduction to the remote ward round (eg, how to get started, what to expect).	6	1
Session objectives were relevant to participant needs.	7	1
Navigation of the technology-based components of the session was logical, consistent, and efficient.	5	1
The session technologies and media supported the learning objectives.	6	0
This session required that participants possess inappropriately high computer skills.	2	1
The educational activities encouraged participants' engagement with session materials/content.	6	1
The educational activities promoted participants' achievement of the session objectives.	6	0
I was able to contribute a personal presence/personal touch during the ward round delivery.	6	0
I plan to use learner feedback to improve the session.	7	0
The remote ward rounds will be easy to maintain and deliver again.	6	1
It will be easy to re-use of all or part of the session materials in other, future sessions.	6	1
I had access to needed tools during ward round delivery.	6	1
I had significant computer/technical problems while delivering this session.	5	1
I received adequate support for any technical issues encountered while developing and delivering this session	7	1
I was able to provide adequate support to students for questions or concerns about their learning.	6	1
The ward round was a good use of time and resources.	6	0
The overall quality of this ward round was excellent.	6	1

ETELM-IP, evaluation of technology-enhanced learning materials-instructor perceptions; IQR, Interquartile range.