Table 2.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis of overall survival in 218 esophageal cancer cases.
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
| Variables | HR (95% CI) | P value | HR (95% CI) | P value |
| Age (years), < 65 vs ≥ 65 | 1.279 (0.939–1.744) | .119 | ||
| Sex, male vs female | 0.707 (0.479–1.043) | .081 | ||
| Pathologic type, ulcerative vs others | 1.238 (0.888–1.726) | .208 | ||
| Histologic grade, 1 + 2 vs 3 | 1.058 (0.753–1.487) | .746 | ||
| Clinical response, resistance vs sensitivity | 1.331 (0.956–1.851) | .090 | ||
| Tumor size (cm), > 4 vs ≤ 4 | 1.244 (0.902–1.716) | .092 | ||
| pT categories, T3 + T4 vs T1 + T2 | 1.977 (1.244–3.142) | .004 | 1.563 (0.939–2.602) | .086 |
| LNM, positive vs negative | 2.349 (1.528–3.611) | <.001 | 1.868 (1.118–3.122) | .017 |
| TNM stage, III + IV vs I + II | 2.050 (1.479–2.840) | <.001 | 1.243 (0.823–1.878) | .300 |
| GNL3L expression, low vs high | 1.504 (1.102–-2.053) | .010 | 1.483 (1.066–2.063) | .019 |