Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 6;7(5):959–968. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.1c00057

Table 1. Pros and Cons of Potential First in Human Proof of Concept Efficacy Studies for Testing a Novel Anti-Cryptosporidium NCEs.

  pros cons
Cryptosporidium controlled human infection model (CHIM) in healthy adults · prospect of benefit in healthy adults with Cryptosporidium induced diarrhea · C. parvum model utilized for technical reasons, although C. hominis more common human pathogen
· informs dose selection for studies in pediatric patients · needs to be established and validated
· clinical syndrome, parasitological and clinical end points under monoinfection condition · limited viability period of GMP oocysts
· conducted in healthy volunteers, mitigates safety confounders · monoinfection state may not be clinically relevant to target pediatric patient population
· phase 1 settings: faster recruitment and smaller sample size · unknown translatability of efficacy to target population
Adult HIV-positive cryptosporidiosis patients · natural infection in potential secondary target population · confounded safety and efficacy due to advanced immunocompromised state
· PK in context of high GI motility · presence of other pathogens/coinfections and/or concurrent medications
· high mortality
· operational complexity in the resource poor settings
Pediatric cryptosporidiosis patient population · assessment of safety and efficacy in the target population · prospect of clinical benefit will not have been previously established
· natural course of infection · high-risk and vulnerable patient population
· with relevant clinical strains · uncertainty in predicted efficacious dose in the context of high GI motility
· risk investment in juvenile toxicity study prior to phase I to avoid program delays
· operational complexity in the resource poor settings