Table 12.

Comparison of recognition accuracy (%) of proposed methods over exiting techniques on LFW

Sl. No	Methods	Recognition rate (%)	Sl. No	Methods	Recognition rate (%)	Sl. No	Methods	Recognition rate (%)
1	Xing	74.64—80.82	9	SA-PFFT	97.47	17	SA-SGEF	97.22
2	DML-eig	82.28—87.94	10	NN-PFFT	98.04	18	NN-SGEF	98.06
3	SILD	80.07—86.04	11	SVM-PFFT	94.18	19	SVM-SGEF	92.30
4	ITML	79.98—85.94	12	PNN-PFFT	98.04	20	PNN-SGEF	98.04
5	LDML	80.65—86.64	13	SA-DGM	97.25	21	SA-GSGEF	96.20
6	KISSME	83.37—88.92	14	NN-DG	98.06	22	NN-GSGEF	98.03
7	DLML	85.35—91.15	15	SVM-DG	97.63	23	SVM-GSGEF	91.60
8	FaceNet	99.63 ± 0.09	16	PNN-DG	97.76	24	PNN-GSGEF	98.04