Table 13.

Comparison of recognition rate (%) of proposed techniques over recent works on LFW dataset

Sl. No	Methods	Recognition rate (%)	Sl. No	Methods	Recognition rate (%)	Sl. No	Methods	Recognition rate (%)
1	LVP	82.96	10	SA-PFFT	97.47	18	SA-SGEF	97.22
2	LDP	76.88	11	NN-PFFT	98.04	19	NN-SGEF	98.06
3	LTrP	80.84	12	SVM-PFFT	94.18	20	SVM-SGEF	92.30
4	LBP	83.16	13	PNN-PFFT	98.04	21	PNN-SGEF	98.04
5	LGHP	87.71	14	SA-DGM	97.25	22	SA-GSGEF	96.20
6	MDML-DCPs + PLDA + Score averaging	94.57 ± 0.30	15	NN-DG	98.06	23	NN-GSGEF	98.03
7	MDML-DCPs + PLDA + SVM	95.13 ± 0.33	16	SVM-DG	97.63	24	SVM-GSGEF	91.60
8	MDML-DCPs + JB + SVM	95.40 ± 0.33	17	PNN-DG	97.76	25	PNN-GSGEF	98.04
9	MDML-DCPs + PLDA + JB + SVM	95.58 ± 0.34