Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 29;32(4):929–935. doi: 10.1021/jasms.0c00419

Table 2. Twenty-six Compounds, from Different GC-MS Data Files (Obtained with Cold-EI, and All with Centroid Data without Mass Calibration), Analyzed by Isotope Abundance Analysis (IAA), IAA, and Mass Accuracy Analysis (MAA) with a ±0.14 Da Window (Possible Even without Mass Calibration), and an Estimation for the Results of IAA and MAA with a ±100 ppm Windowa.

cmpd name, formula, and mass No. of candidates IAA result hit #, EFP, and EMA IAA ± 0.14 Da hit #, EFP, and EMA estimation for IAA ± 100 ppm, EFP, and EMA
dimethoate, C5H12NO3S2P, 228.9991 Da 787 #1, EFP > 787, EMA < 1 ppm #1, EFP > 1215, EMA < 0.6 ppm EFP > 7426, EMA < 0.11 ppm
Quinol ED, C14H19NO, 217.1461 Da 693 #2, EFP = 347, EMA = 5.1 ppm #2, EFP = 504, EMA = 3.5 ppm EFP = 3252, EMA = 0.54 ppm
diazinone, C12H21N2O3SP, 304.1005 Da 2413 #4, EFP = 603, EMA = 4.8 ppm #3, EFP = 1281, EMA = 2.3 ppm EFP = 5896, EMA = 0.49 ppm
chlorpyrifos, C9H11NO3Cl3SP, 348.9257 Da 4266 #87, EFP = 49, EMA = 9.4 ppm #84, EFP = 174, EMA = 2.6 ppm EFP = 699, EMA = 0.66 ppm
methidathion, C6H11N2O4PS3, 301.9613 Da 2456 #4, EFP = 614, EMA = 1.3 ppm #4, EFP = 1282, EMA = 0.6 ppm EFP = 5944, EMA = 0.13 ppm
tebuconazole, C16H22ClN3O, 307.1446 Da 2247 #8, EFP = 281, EMA = 5.4 ppm #6, EFP = 584, EMA = 2.6 ppm EFP = 2660, EMA = 0.57 ppm
iprodione, C13H13Cl2N3O3, 329.0328 Da 2984 #30, EFP = 99, EMA = 9.5 ppm #28, EFP = 348, EMA = 2.7 ppm EFP = 1479, EMA = 0.64 ppm
bifenthrin, C23H22ClF3O2, 422.1255 Da 20440 #27, EFP = 757, EMA = 1.8 ppm #19, EFP = 2703, EMA = 0.5 ppm EFP = 8964, EMA = 0.15 ppm
bifenazate, C17H20N2O3, 300.1468 Da 2385 #1, EFP > 2385, EMA < 0.7 ppm #1, EFP > 5128, EMA < 0.3 ppm EFP > 23920, EMA < 0.07 ppm
pyriproxyfen, C20H19NO3, 321.1359 Da 2645 #2, EFP = 1323, EMA = 1.8 ppm #1, EFP > 4611, EMA < 0.5 ppm EFP > 20100, EMA < 0.12 ppm
prochloraz, C15H16Cl3N3O2, 375.0303 Da 5447 #42, EFP = 130, EMA = 5.2 ppm #36, EFP = 463, EMA = 1.5 ppm EFP = 1728, EMA = 0.39 ppm
tridecane, C13H28, 184.2186 Da 421 #1, EFP > 421, EMA < 36 ppm #1, EFP > 551, EMA < 27.5 ppm EFP > 4191, EMA < 3.62 ppm
eicosane, C20H42, 282.3281 Da 2001 #2, EFP = 1001, EMA = 29 ppm #1, EFP > 2077, EMA < 14 ppm EFP > 10297, EMA < 2.82 ppm
triacontane, C30H62, 422.4846 Da 6575 #13, EFP = 506, EMA = 123 ppm #3, EFP = 1804, EMA = 34.5 ppm EFP = 5976, EMA = 10.41 ppm
HMTD, C6H12N2O6, 208.069 Da 648 #1, EFP > 648, EMA < 0.6 ppm #1, EFP > 954, EMA < 0.4 ppm EFP > 6421, EMA < 0.06 ppm
xylazine, C12H16N2S, 220.1029 Da 841 #2, EFP = 421, EMA = 2.3 ppm #1, EFP > 654, EMA < 1.5 ppm EFP > 4159, EMA < 0.23 ppm
phenothiazine, C12H9NS, 199.045 Da 444 #1, EFP > 444, EMA < 0.5 ppm #1, EFP > 617, EMA < 0.4 ppm EFP > 4339, EMA < 0.05 ppm
propranolol, C16H21NO2, 259.1567 Da 1183 #1, EFP > 1183, EMA < 1.1 ppm #1, EFP > 2105, EMA < 0.6 ppm EFP > 11372, EMA < 0.11 ppm
triflupromazine, C18H19F3N2S, 352.1216 Da 11410 #1, EFP > 11410, EMA < 0.01 ppm #1, EFP > 40619, EMA < 0.01 ppm EFP > 161497, EMA < 0.01 ppm
promethazine, C17H20N2S, 284.1342 Da 1992 #4, EFP = 498, EMA = 4.1 ppm #4, EFP = 1051, EMA = 1.9 ppm EFP = 5178, EMA = 0.39 ppm
promazine, C17H20N2S, 284.1342 Da 1992 #2, EFP = 996, EMA = 1.4 ppm #2, EFP = 2102, EMA = 0.7 ppm EFP = 10355, EMA = 0.13 ppm
chlorpromazine, C17H19ClN2S, 318.0952 Da 2896 #1, EFP > 2896, EMA < 0.3 ppm #1, EFP > 6349, EMA < 0.1 ppm EFP > 27944, EMA < 0.03 ppm
haloperidol, C21H23ClFNO2, 375.1396 Da 10955 #38, EFP = 288, EMA = 3.6 ppm #30, EFP = 1028, EMA = 1 ppm EFP = 3835, EMA = 0.27 ppm
benzene, propyl-, C9H12, 120.0934 Da 90 #1, EFP > 90, EMA < 2.9 ppm #1, EFP > 59, EMA < 4.4 ppm EFP > 693, EMA < 0.38 ppm
propane, 1,3-dibromo-, C3H6Br2, 199.8831 Da 574 #1, EFP > 574, EMA < 7.8 ppm #1, EFP > 801, EMA < 5.6 ppm EFP > 5607, EMA < 0.8 ppm
finasteride, C23H36N2O2, 372.2771 Da 4553 #1, EFP > 4553, EMA < 3.4 ppm #1, EFP > 16183, EMA < 1 ppm EFP > 60860, EMA < 0.25 ppm
descriptive statistics for EMA   avg = 10.1 ppm avg = 4.3 ppm avg = 0.9 ppm
SD = 24.5 ppm SD = 8.4 ppm SD = 2.1 ppm
median = 3.2 ppm median = 1.3 ppm median = 0.3 ppm
a

The results for #1 hits in IAA and MAA columns are calculated using the estimated filtration power of the mass window (the ratio of the full mass defect range divided by 100 ppm). The number of candidates are all possible elemental formulae with the same nominal mass and within the following elemental range: O 0-8, N 0-5, S 0-4, P 0-2, Cl 0-2, Br 0-2 (Carbon and Hydrogen are not restricted), except for the following changes: for Chlorpyrifos Cl 0-4, for Bifenthrin F 0-3, for Prochloraz Cl 0-4, for Triflupromazin F 0-3, and for Haloperidol F 0-2. The number of isotopologue peaks used was usually 4, and it was raised when the measured pattern exhibited information in higher masses (multiple chlorine/bromine for example).