Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Dec 9;77(6):941–950.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.013

Table 1:

Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Study Sample, and by Survey type.

Total Sample (N=932) e-Literacy Survey Sub-sample (N=633) mHealth/Technology Use Survey Sub-sample (N=424) P-value
Age, mean (SD) 67.9 (9.3) 67.6 (9.2) 68.5 (9.2) 0.06
Male gender, % 58.5 60.5 56.1 0.08
Race/Ethnicity, % <0.001
 Non-Hispanic White 37.9 31.9 42.9
 Non-Hispanic Black 51.4 54.8 49.8
 Hispanic 7.6 10.7 3.5
 Other 3.1 2.5 3.8
Annual Household Income, % 0.18
 <$20,000 25.4 26.2 25.5
 $20–50,000 25.1 26.9 23.6
 >$50,000 34.2 31.4 35.9
 Prefer not to answer 15.2 15.5 15.1
Education, % <0.001
 <High school 15.2 18.5 12.7
 High school/some college 47.0 47.6 47.2
 College or higher 37.8 33.9 40.1
Clinical Recruitment Site*, % <0.001
 East Coast 50.6 67.3 28.5
 Midwest 35.9 32.4 42.2
 South 6.4 0 14.2
 West Coast 7.0 0.3 15.1
Adequate Health Literacy1, % 89.0 87.4 90.8 0.04
Cognition score2, mean (SD) 91.7 (8.0) 91.1 (8.5) 92.2 (6.9) 0.02
Depressive symptom score3, mean (SD) 7.6 (8.0) 7.8 (8.3) 7.3 (7.3) 0.69
eGFR, ml/min/1.73m2, mean (SD) 54.4 (15.3) 53.6 (15.7) 54.4 (14.6) 0.06
Prevalent cardiovascular disease, % 25.5 25.6 26.4 0.85
Diabetes, % 46.6 49.3 44.3 0.04
Hypertension, % 85.2 88.2 81.6 <0.001
Charlson Comorbidity score, mean (SD) 5.1 (2.0) 5.2 (2.0) 5.1 (2.0) 0.05
Disease self-efficacy4, mean (SD) 41.3 (8.7) 41.3 (9.1) 41.2 (7.9) 0.25
Social support score5, mean (SD)^ 16.0 (5.9) 15.7 (6.0) 16.4 (5.9) 0.33
Adequate eHealth Literacy6, % -- 27.2 -- --

eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate

*

East coast (Philadelphia, PA, Baltimore, MA), Midwest (Ann Arbor, MI; Cleveland, OH; Chicago, IL), South (New Orleans, LA); West Coast (San Francisco, CA; Oakland, CA)

1

Assessed with S-TOFHLA instrument (adequate score >16, out of 36)16

2

Assessed with modified mini-Mental State Exam (score range 0–100)18

3

Assessed with Becks depression inventory (score range 0–63)17

4

Assessed with disease self-efficacy20 (score range 5–50); only assessed in Phase III cohort participants (N=462)

5

Assessed with Lubben social network scale, score range (0–30)19; only assessed in Phase III cohort participants ≥65 years of age (N=235)

6

Assessed with eHEALS survey (adequate score ≥32, out of 40)10,11

^

X2 testing of difference across survey type sub-samples for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables