Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021 Apr 12;413(14):3763–3774. doi: 10.1007/s00216-021-03324-5

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Results of a matrix fortification study with standard addition of glyphosate (a) and AMPA (b) in Haw River samples. Results from analyte-spiked and EDTA-amended samples (white bars, [EDTA] = 10 μM and [Analyte]spiked = 20 μg L−1) and analyte-spiked samples without EDTA amendment (black bars, [EDTA] = 0 μM and [Analyte]spiked = 20 μg L−1) are shown. The dashed line represents the spiked analyte concentration of 20 μg L−1. Error bars represent standard deviation among triplicate analysis of samples. Location CCB was the only river sample with background glyphosate measured at 1.5 μg L−1 (gray bar in panel A), which contributed to the elevated measured concentration of glyphosate in the standard addition sample (22 ± 1 μg L−1). No background AMPA levels were detected in these samples