Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;22(6):912–921. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0447

Table 3. Lesion-Based Diagnostic Performance of DLLD and Readers in the Binary Classification of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

Testee Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) DLLD vs. Reader (P) FPP (95% CI) DLLD vs. Reader (P)
DLLD 81.82 [81/99] (72.68, 88.39) 1.330 [113/85] (1.052, 1.681)
Radiologist 0.795 < 0.001*
 Reader-averaged 80.81 (73.03, 86.75) 0.357 (0.275, 0.464)
  Reader 1 77.78 [77/99] 0.118 [10/85]
  Reader 2 82.83 [82/99] 0.518 [44/85]
  Reader 3 81.82 [81/99] 0.435 [37/85]
Resident 0.569 < 0.001*
 Reader-averaged 79.46 (70.76, 86.08) 0.667 (0.531, 0.838)
  Reader 4 82.83 [82/99] 1.306 [111/85]
  Reader 5 80.81 [80/99] 0.471 [40/85]
  Reader 6 74.75 [74/99] 0.224 [19/85]

*Statistically significant. CI = confidence interval, DLLD = deep learning-based lesion detection algorithm, FPP = false positives per patient