Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;22(6):912–921. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0447

Table 4. Subgroup Analysis of Diagnostic Performance in the Binary Classification of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

Testee < 10 mm (n = 23) ≥ 10 mm (n = 76)
Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) DLLD vs. Reader (P) Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) DLLD vs. Reader (P) Sensitivity between Size Subgroup (P)
DLLD 56.52 [13/23] (34.67, 76.10) 89.47 [68/76] (79.56, 94.89) < 0.001*
Radiologist 0.371 0.722 < 0.001*
 Reader-averaged 47.83 (30.81, 65.36) 90.79 (83.57, 95.03)
  Reader 1 43.48 [10/23] 88.16 [67/76]
  Reader 2 47.83 [11/23] 93.42 [71/76]
  Reader 3 52.17 [12/23] 90.79 [69/76]
Resident 0.132 0.593 < 0.001*
 Reader-averaged 40.58 (25.75, 57.35) 91.23 (84.64, 95.15)
  Reader 4 56.52 [13/23] 90.79 [69/76]
  Reader 5 43.48 [10/23] 92.11 [70/76]
  Reader 6 21.74 [5/23] 90.79 [69/76]

*Statistically significant. CI = confidence interval, DLLD = deep learning-based lesion detection algorithm