Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;22(6):912–921. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2020.0447

Table 5. Per-Patient Diagnostic Performance of DLLD and Readers in the Binary Classification of Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

Testee Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) DLLD vs. Reader (P) Specificity (%) (95% CI) DLLD vs. Reader (P)
DLLD 87.50 [35/40] (73.30, 94.70) 22.22 [10/45] (12.40, 36.60)
Radiologist 0.790 < 0.001*
 Reader-averaged 85.80 (78.40, 91.00) 66.67 (58.31, 74.10)
  Reader 1 82.50 [33/40] 91.11 [41/45]
  Reader 2 90.00 [36/40] 53.33 [24/45]
  Reader 3 85.00 [34/40] 55.56 [25/45]
Resident 0.700 < 0.001*
 Reader-averaged 85.00 (77.40, 90.30) 55.56 (47.09, 63.70)
  Reader 4 90.00 [36/40] 24.44 [11/45]
  Reader 5 87.50 [35/40] 57.78 [26/45]
  Reader 6 77.50 [31/40] 84.44 [38/45]

*Statistically significant. CI = confidence interval, DLLD = deep learning-based lesion detection algorithm