Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;126(6):869–877. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01339-7

Table 3.

Comparison of Conventional CT Versus CBCT Patellar Measurements by Rater

Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Average for 3 Raters
Conv. CT CBCT p value Conv. CT CBCT p Conv. CT CBCT p Conv. CT CBCT p value
Congruence Angle (deg) 31.9 ± 13.0 34.1 ± 20.0 0.62 17.2 ± 13.1 24.6 ± 13.2 0.03 20.4 ± 16.8 24.2 ± 19.1 0.50 23.1 ± 15.5 27.7 ± 17.9 0.08
Tilt Angle (deg) 15.6 ± 13.2 16.8 ± 10.8 0.54 16.2 ± 8.0 14.1 ± 9.3 0.41 15.4 ± 9.0 12.7 ± 10.3 0.17 15.7 ± 10.1 14.5 ± 10.1 0.32
TT-TG (mm) 16.5 ± 4.2 9.4 ± 5.1  < .001 15.9 ± 5.7 10.6 ± 5.4  < .001 15.2 ± 4.8 9.8 ± 5.5  < .001 15.9 ± 4.9 9.9 ± 5.3  < .001

Mean ± SD of data derived from conventional (conv. CT) and cone-beam (CBCT) computed tomography, along with relevant p value as by paired t test, for each of the three raters