Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 3;126(6):869–877. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01339-7

Table 4.

Comparison of conventional CT versus CBCT patellar measurements between raters by type of CT

conventional CT CBCT
Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 p value Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 p value
Congruence angle (deg) 31.9 ± 13.0 17.2 ± 13.1 20.4 ± 16.8 0.01 34.1 ± 20.0 24.6 ± 13.2 24.2 ± 19.1 0.19
Tilt Angle (deg) 15.6 ± 13.2 16.2 ± 8.0 15.4 ± 9.0 0.96 16.8 ± 10.8 14.1 ± 9.3 12.7 ± 10.3 0.50
TT-TG (mm) 16.5 ± 4.2 15.9 ± 5.7 15.2 ± 4.8 0.73 9.4 ± 5.1 10.6 ± 5.4 9.8 ± 5.5 0.80

Data are presented as mean ± SD. CT, computed tomography; CBCT, cone beam computed tomography; conv. CT, conventional computed tomography; Cong. Angle, congruence angle; TT-TG, tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove