Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 8;20(3):833–850. doi: 10.1007/s10237-021-01433-9

Table 1.

Overview of experimental methods and results related to uniaxially constrained tissue equivalents seeded with human dermal fibroblasts (FB)

Cell type Force (μN106cells) Cell density (106cellsml) Collagen concentration (mgml) Annotations References
Human dermal FB 2522 (Max.) 0.20 0.46 Delvoye et al. (1991)
2377 (Max.) 0.40
Human dermal FB 126 (Plat.) 1.10 1.00 Eastwood et al. (1994)
Human dermal FB 260-609 (Max.) Unknown 0.80 Different cell lines Eastwood et al. (1996)
333 (Plat.) Extraction by collagenase digestion
516 (Plat.) Extraction by explant growth
Human dermal FB 355 (Max.) 1.00 1.50 No mAb 4B4 (β1-blocking antibody) Jenkins et al. (1999)
252 (Max.) 1 μg/ml mAb 4B4
218 (Max.) 2 μg/ml mAb 4B4
Human dermal FB -54(Plat.)342(Max.)629(Plat.) 1.00 1.70 0%FBS2%FBS10%FBSMatched cell line andPassage number() Brown et al. (2002)
334(Max.)254(Max.)544(Max.)515(Max.)82(Max.) 2%FBS, no TGF-β12%FBS,2.5ng/ml TGF-β12%FBS,7.5ng/ml TGF-β12%FBS,15.0ng/ml TGF-β12%FBS,30.0ng/ml TGF-β1
80(Max.)258(Plat.)381(Max.)118(Max.) 2%FBS, 2.5 ng/ml TGF-β32%FBS,7.5ng/ml TGF-β32%FBS,15.0ng/ml TGF-β32%FBS,30.0ng/ml TGF-β3
199(Max.)623(Plat.) 2%FBS, no TGF-β1or-β32%FBS,12.5ng/ml TGF-β12%FBS,15.0ng/ml TGF-β3
Human dermal FB 159 (Plat.) 0.29 1.83 Campbell et al. (2003)
182 (Max.)
Human dermal FB 129 (Plat.) 1.00 Unknown 0% prestrain, FBS addition after 0 h Karamichos et al. (2007)
17 (Max.) 5% prestrain, FBS addition after 0 h
34 (Max.) 10% prestrain, FBS addition after 0 h
179 (Plat.) 0% prestrain, FBS addition after 1 h
78 (Plat.) 5% prestrain, FBS addition after 1 h
15 (Plat.) 10% prestrain, FBS addition after 1 h

Forces refer to experiments without (or before) any external strain applied. The culture medium contained 10% FBS unless indicated differently. Maximal forces (Max.) and plateau forces (Plat.) are normalized by the number of cells used in the experiment. Due to missing data, the possibly more suitable normalization (force/cross-sectional area)/(number of cells/gel volume) was not possible. Therefore, information about the dimensions of the tissue equivalents (cross-sectional area, length, volume) in future studies would facilitate the comparison between experiments