Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;3(2):fcab097. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab097

Table 2.

Parietofrontal network connectivity in patients and controls

Stroke
Control
Stroke vs. control
95% Conf.
95% Conf.
FC Mean Lower Upper P-value Mean Lower Upper P-value P-value
PMV-M1 0.16 0.08 0.24 0.001* 0.14 0.04 0.23 0.009* 0.648
SMA-M1 0.13 0.03 0.24 0.016* 0.21 0.13 0.29 0.001* 0.238
AIPS-M1 0.35 0.26 0.44 0.001* 0.14 0.05 0.23 0.004* 0.003
CIPS-M1 0.17 0.07 0.28 0.003* 0.04 −0.06 0.14 0.430 0.053
SMA-PMV 0.05 −0.04 0.15 0.254 0.10 0.02 0.17 0.015* 0.459
AIPS-PMV 0.14 0.04 0.23 0.008 0.20 0.09 0.31 0.002* 0.389
CIPS-PMV 0.04 −0.06 0.14 0.428 0.20 0.06 0.34 0.009* 0.065
AIPS-SMA 0.03 −0.05 0.12 0.437 0.02 −0.06 0.10 0.588 0.840
CIPS-SMA 0.03 −0.07 0.12 0.556 0.00 −0.09 0.09 0.967 0.693
CIPS-aIPS 0.44 0.30 0.58 0.001* 0.41 0.31 0.50 0.001* 0.695

Mean values of functional connectivity (FC) are given with 95% confidence intervals for stroke patients and healthy controls. Raw P-values are given derived from student’s t-tests against 0.

*

Significant values after FDR-correction for 20 tests across both groups. For group comparison, linear models were calculated across both groups and raw P-values of the main effect GROUP are given with † indicating significant values after FDR-correction for 10 tests.