Table 3.
Logistic regression analysis of EDs consumption versus non-EDs consumption
| Items | β | SE | OR | 95% CI | P value |
| Male | 0.48 | 0.08 | 1.61 | 1.38 to 1.88 | <0.001 |
| Age | −0.08 | 0.03 | 0.92 | 0.88 to 0.97 | 0.003 |
| Correctly identify | 0.35 | 0.04 | 1.42 | 1.32 to 1.53 | <0.001 |
| Whether there are adverse effects? (Yes) | −0.24 | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.66 to 0.94 | 0.010 |
| Students attitude (negative) | <0.001 | ||||
| Neutral | 1.80 | 0.09 | 6.02 | 5.07 to 7.14 | <0.001 |
| Positive | 3.17 | 0.24 | 23.81 | 14.81 to 38.25 | <0.001 |
| Parental attitude (negative) | <0.001 | ||||
| Neutral | 0.32 | 0.09 | 1.38 | 1.14 to 1.66 | 0.001 |
| Positive | 1.39 | 0.12 | 4.01 | 3.19 to 5.04 | <0.001 |
| ASLEC | 0.004 | 0.002 | 1.004 | 1.00 to 1.01 | 0.047 |
ASLEC, Adolescent Self-rating Life Events Checklist; EDs, energy drinks.