Abstract
Elaborate electrodes that enable adhesion to the skin surface and effectively collect vital signs are necessitated. In recent years, various electrode materials and novel structures have been developed, and they have garnered scientific attention due to their higher sensing performances compared with those of conventional electrode-based sensors. This paper provides an overview of recent advances in biomedical sensors, focusing on the development of novel electrodes. We comprehensively review the different types of electrode materials in the context of efficient biosignal detection, with respect to material composition for flexible and wearable electrodes and novel electrode structures. Finally, we discuss recent packaging technologies in biomedical applications using flexible and wearable electrodes.
Keywords: Biosensors, Flexible electrodes, Packaging, Composite dry electrode, Electrical biosignals
Introduction
Owing to the rapid development of information technology (IT) based on computer and network technology, IT has been applied in many fields, including the field of medical devices in recent years. In particular, the field of small and personal portable medical devices has become the central point for incorporating IT in the medical field[1, 2]. For future electronic medical devices, it is essential to strengthen relationships with demanding institutions such as hospitals and medical services; furthermore, relevant and complementary cooperation with industries are expanding significantly because of smarter electronic medical devices and their association with software and content [1].
In addition, the trend in personal disease management has changed significantly. As the paradigm of medical treatment shifts from treatment centered to prediction and prevention oriented, the importance of personal diagnostic technology is increasing [3]. According to the World Health Organization, the number of global cancer patients in 2018 was 18.1 million, of which one among five men and one among six women were diagnosed with cancer, and one among eight men and one among 11 women were expected to die [4]. Although treatment methods for cancer are constantly being developed, the mortality rate of cancer patients is still high owing to difficulties in the early detection of cancer and accurate diagnoses. To solve such difficulties, a next-generation convergence diagnosis system that can accurately diagnose various diseases is being developed through the combination of various technologies such as biotechnology, information communication technology, and conventional diagnostic technologies [5].
Hence, to materialize a personalized and prediction-oriented disease diagnosis, the fabrication of high-performance biosignal acquisition devices is essential. Biosignal acquisition devices are categorized into electrocardiogram (ECG), electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG), electrooculogram (EOG), skin conductivity (galvanic skin response), skin temperature, and photoplethysmography. Representative biosignals are shown in Table 1 [6].
Table 1.
Typical amplitude and frequency ranges of electrical biosignals
Reprinted from Ref. [6] with permission
| Electrical biosignals | Amplitude (mV) | Frequency range (Hz) |
|---|---|---|
| Electromyogram (EMG) | 0.5–5 | 2–500 |
| Electrooculogram (EOG) | 1–10 | 0.05–100 |
| Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 5 × 10− 4–5 | Up to 100 |
| Electroencephalogram (EEG) | 2 × 10− 3–0.1 | 0.5–100 |
| Evoked-potential/Even-related potential (EP/RP) | 1 × 10− 4–0.2 | 1–300 |
The core technologies of biosignal acquisition devices are (1) sensor (detector and amplifier) technology to detect biosignals from a living body, (2) interfacial signal processing analysis technology, (3) printer and display technology to output the analyzed result, and (4) circuit technology considering safety issues. Among the core technologies, interfacial signal processing is one of the most crucial for obtaining minute biosignals. Most biosignal losses during its acquisition are from the interface condition between the electrode and the surface of the skin. Hence, soft and flexible electrodes that can offer intimate adhesion to the skin surface and effectively collect biosignals should be developed.
Herein, we briefly overview the types of soft and flexible electrode materials used in an efficient biosignal acquisition system. In Sect. 2, various electrode materials, including homogeneous and composite materials, are presented. The effective and novel structures of the electrodes are discussed in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, packaging technologies for the construction of low-voltage circuitry are reviewed. In Sect. 5, future opportunities for commercializing high-performance soft and flexible electrodes in biosignal acquisition systems are discussed.
Materials
Homogeneous materials for soft and flexible electrodes
In clinical practice, a conductive paste or gel (electrolyte) is typically used to attach an electrode to the human skin. Conformal contact between electrodes and the human skin lowers the impedance of the skin, resulting in the efficient acquisition of biosignals. Electrodes used in such a manner are known as “wet electrodes.” In a wet electrode, a chemical reaction occurs where charges are transferred at the interface between an electrolyte without free electrons and an electrode without ions. Owing to such a chemical reaction, the neutral state of the interface between the electrode and electrolyte is compromised, and a potential difference from that of the surrounding area appears. This potential difference is known as the “half-cell potential.” The lower the half-cell potential, the better is the performance because the current passing through the interface between the electrode and electrolyte consumes less energy. Currently, silver/silver chloride (Ag/AgCl) electrodes are used widely in clinical practice owing to their ease of manufacture as well as safety for the human body owing to their low half-electrode potential. However, regardless of the material, the wet electrode presents several disadvantages owing to the attachment method. First, to attach the wet electrode on the human skin, dead skin cells at the desired location (skin abrasion) must be peeled off. In addition, gel application, impedance tuning on a device level and cleaning after the biosignal measurement are required. In addition, as the electrolyte dries over time, the impedance of the skin will increase, which is disadvantageous. Hence, it is not suitable for unprofessional persons to use wet electrodes in emergency cases.
Meanwhile, a dry electrode refers to an electrode that does not contain an electrolyte. The development of dry electrodes for the acquisition of biosignals have focused primarily on dry electrode materials, e.g., metals such as stainless steel, Ag/AgCl, and Ag. These electrodes can be utilized for the emergency monitoring of critically ill patients, brain–computer interfaces, etc. because they can be attached to the human skin surface quickly and easily. The utilization of dry electrodes has been limited to EMG, ECG, and EOG, where biosignals are significant. The acquisition of EEG signals using dry electrodes has not been extensively investigated because of their small signal amplitude. Herein, we provide an overview of dry electrodes used in biosignal acquisition.
Wei et al. reported a metal dry bioelectrode using red Cu (99.9 %), as shown in Fig. 1a [7]. The red Cu metal dry bioelectrodes were microstructured using laser micromachining technology. The synergistic effect of red Cu and the microstructure provided an enhanced biosignal acquisition of ECG from patients. Baek et al. reported the fabrication of Ti dry electrodes on a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrate for the measurement of ECG signals [8]. Owing to the utilization of PDMS, flexibility and biocompatibility were achieved; the Ti/PDMS dry electrodes exhibited long-term reliability. Meng et al. described the fabrication of a microdome array of Ni-based dry electrodes, as shown in Fig. 1b [9]. The performance of the Ni-based dry electrodes were comparable to that of a standard wet electrode (Ag/AgCl). The Ni-based dry electrodes were encapsulated with PDMS to enhance their biocompatibility, and the structural benefit from the microdome design resulted in the acquisition of high fidelity biosignals from patients. Jung et al. reported the fabrication of a flexible dry electrode based on carbon nanotubes (CNTs), as shown in Fig. 1c [10]. Commercially available CNTs were mixed with PDMS (concentration range: 1–4.5 %). It is noteworthy that the concentration and diameter of the CNT electrodes are important for the acquisition of ECG signals. In particular, CNT dry electrodes exhibited long-term stability and high robustness during the monitoring of motion and sweat.
Fig. 1.
a Schematic diagram of structure design of metal dry bioelectrode. Reproduced from Ref. [7] with permission. b Illustration of dry microdome electrode array. Reproduced from Ref. [9] with permission. c Schematic diagram showing fabrication process of CNT/PDMS composite electrodes. Reproduced from Ref. [10] with permission. d Chemical structure of PEDOT/PSS
The use of an electrode coated with a conductive polymer offers several advantages. For example, it is easy to increase the electrode surface area, control the hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of the electrodes, and impregnate biomolecules. The Kipke group at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, demonstrated that when poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS, chemical structure is shown in Fig. 1d) doped with a surfactant (poly(oxyethylene) 10-oleyl ether) was electrochemically coated on an Au electrode surface, the electrode indicated an impedance that was 24 times lower than that of an unmodified electrode. In an in vivo insertion experiment, the impedance of the electrode modified with PEDOT increased by two to three times after 7 days of insertion; however, the impedance of the Au electrode increased by a factor of 0.5, indicating that the PEDOT-modified electrode had a significantly lower impedance and better biocompatibility than the Au electrode [11].
Composite dry electrode for flexible and wearable biomedical applications
Recently, researchers have employed printed/flexible/wearable dry electrodes and, more specifically, composite dry electrodes, for monitoring biomedical signals, e.g., ECG signals, which does not require the application of wet gel on the skin while providing conformal contact at the electrode–skin interface, better impedance with skin, less noise while in motion (e.g., sports) sweat secretions, etc. [12, 13]. Conventional Ag/AgCl wet gel electrodes cause inconvenience, instability, and infection to the skin and may be able to satisfy signal acquisition for wearable applications. In addition to their exceptional electrical properties, CNTs offer excellent mechanical properties; therefore, they are widely investigated as a promising candidate for a new generation of composite resources. However, the greater the dispersion and the weaker the interfacial bonding edge, the better is the efficacy of CNTs for supporting polymeric media [12]. Several techniques have been employed to improve adhesion at the interface. By adding 1 part per hundred resin (phr) of multiwall CNTs (MWCNTs) with styrene-butadiene copolymer, an increase in the modulus by 45 % and an increase in the tensile length by 70 % can be achieved. It was discovered that the conductivity increased by five orders of magnitude for 2 and 4 phr, forming a percolating network. Therefore, CNT-based elastomeric composites are suitable as a carbon-type supporting pitch for rubber constituents [12]. The ECG signal intensity of a dry electrode using MWCNT/PDMS, amalgamated as a conductive polymer, was discovered to be better than a marketable electrode with a wet Ag/AgCl layer [13, 14]. Sanchez et al. fabricated a CNT/polysulfone composite, which was reported to demonstrate adequate potential in screen-printed disposable electrodes to exhibit high electrochemical activity and mechanical stability in addition to allowing the incorporation of the HRP enzyme [15]. According to the operating principle, three types of dry electrodes were used: surface, invasive microneedle, and capacitive electrodes. Among them, capacitive sensors, which do not require any physical or conductive connection with the skin surface, indicate a higher potential for the mainstream market; however, data acquisition and fabrication techniques must be improved [16]. Conduction in the CNT/poly epoxy composite is primarily due to tunneling, and the insulating polymer is vital to the transport mechanism [17]. The CNT content and interfacing orientation are crucial to the temperature and conduction dependencies. (Fig. 2)
Fig. 2.
a Experiment setup for skin impedance measurement. b Setup for ECG measurements using MWCNT/PDMS composite dry electrode. c Comparison of dry and wet ECG signals obtained from wet Ag/AgCl electrode.
Reprinted from Ref. [13] with permission
Jung et al. fabricated a CNT–PDMS-based dry ECG electrode that can be easily applied to regularly used ECG devices to achieve optimum performance with different CNT orientations, thicknesses, and diameters [10]. The Gause factor of a CNT/PDMS composite with 18 wt% is 12.4, indicating its excellent pressure sensitivity for biometric sensors [18]. The advancement of novel stretchable conductors increases their potential to be applied in neuroscience as well as affects the development of new-generation wearable and implantable biosensing platforms with solution-processable and transportable energy substitutions [19]. Khan et al. established an MWCNT/PDMS composite layer on a thick layer of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) flexible substrate for bendable applications. Resistance change was observed in the sensors at convex and concave angles [20]. Lee et al. demonstrated a stretchable, elastomeric MWCNT/PDMS composite fabricated via mixing and an electrical percolation threshold method, which involved a significant decline in resistance was observed at 0.6 wt% of MWCNT fillers [21]. Using microcontact printing and casting mold techniques, PDMS was implanted into a conductive elastomer, whereas MWCNTs were extensively mixed into PDMS as conductive fillers using toluene as the standard solvent. The fabrication process was easy and inexpensive [22].
Two key methods, namely chemical and physical methods, are used to functionalize the fundamentally sluggish behavior exhibited by the CNT surface. A few chemical methods that can deliver covalent functional groups on top of the CNT surface include fluorination, carbene and nitrene addition, chlorination, hydrogenation, bromination, cycloaddition, and silanization.
Polymer coating around CNTs, use of different ionic surfactants, and the endohedral method are physical approaches that enable CNTs to be dispersed and improve the interfacial interactions between CNTs and the interface of the polymer. In chemical functionalization techniques, acids and chemicals are dispersed, which may damage the CNT interface [12].
In conclusion, composite dry electrodes have ample potential for achieving good conductivity, self-adhesiveness, mechanical flexibility and stretchability, biocompatibility, low interfacial impedance of the skin electrode, and excellent skin compliance. However, before CNT/PDMS dry electrodes can be applied extensively and commercialized, a few fundamental issues must be addressed: (i) their lower solubility and dispersion when combined with polymer resins; (ii) deprived CNT–polymer interfacial grip [23]. Using different types of mechanical approaches, including ultrasonics, stirring, shear mixing, ball milling, calendaring, and extrusion, a uniform dispersion may be achieved. Applicable methods and their fabrication processing conditions should be optimized to minimize mechanical damage to CNTs.
Electrode structure engineering
Electrode design is an important factor for improving sensing characteristics. An improved readout current response can be achieved using a desirable electrode structure. Instead of conventional flat-electrode deposition, periodic micro- or nanopatterned electrode structures have been proposed. Herein, we present a compilation of recent studies pertaining to novel electrode structures, including (1) microneedles, (2) porous surfaces, (3) nanomeshes, and (3) atomic phase structure engineering for high-performance biosensing applications.
A microneedle-structured electrode penetrates the skin, forms a contact interface between the microneedle and skin tissue, and removes the high impedance of the stratum corneum. The dry electrode of a microneedle reduces the motion artifact with a lower noise signal and accurately records the vital signs (Fig. 3a) [24, 25]. Needle-shaped electrodes have been fabricated using various processing techniques, such as photolithography with overcut photoresist [26–28], laser drilling, molding [29–31], and three-dimensional printing [32–35]. Using microneedle electrodes, the detection of biomedical signals from EMG, ECG, and EEG were achieved [36]. Furthermore, a real-time β-lactam sensing in vivo was conducted using a microneedle-based electrode (Fig. 3b) [37] In order to record an efficient biosignal, the form of invasive microneedle are fabricated. However, the absence of reliable fabrication method for a centimeter-scale microneedle array and an efficient protocol that describe the attachment of the microneedle array to the human skin surface must be investigated together.
Fig. 3.
a Equivalent schematics of flexible dry electrode (FDE) and flexible microneedle array electrode (FMAE). Reprinted from Ref. [24] with permission. b Post-use dose-response curve for microneedle-based biosensor. Reprinted from Ref. [37] with permission. c Illustration of fabrication process of graphene nanomesh structure. Reprinted from Ref. [44] with permission. d Measured electrochemical characteristics curves of relative changes in current peak at fixed potential vs. concentration of DNA detected. Reprinted from Ref. [45] with permission
To enhance the electrochemical sensing properties or to enlarge the active surface area, a novel porous structure has been presented [38, 39]. The porous structure of an Fc-CS/SWNTs/GOD film provided highly sensitive electrocatalytic properties for glucose detection limits with excellent biocompatibility [40]. In addition, a porous Na2CO3/PDMS structure that resulted in a body moving sensor operation with self-powered energy harvesting behavior has been proposed [41]. Recently, a nanomesh structure platform using graphene or transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) has been proposed [42, 43]. Performing photolithography using a block copolymer-based photoresist resulted in a nanomesh structure with periodic holes of a few nanometers. Owing to accurately controlled nanometer-sized holes in graphene or TMDs, significantly enhanced sensing performances, such as a high biosensing capability with a high surface-to-volume ratio, were achieved (Fig. 3c,d) [44, 45]. The most significant advantage of the nanomesh structure is its easy-to-fabricate pattern. As mentioned above, the self-assembled block copolymer offers elaborate hole patterns without additional or complex lithography processes. Although high surface-to-volume ratios have been achieved through nanomesh or porous structures, it is still necessary to develop reproducible and scalable manufacturing methods to implement practical applications.
Instead of electrode structure modification, the atomic phase structure engineering of the material was attempted. Through a phase transition from 2 H (trigonal prismatic coordination) to 1T (octahedral symmetry) of TMDs, excellent capacitive behavior, electrocatalytic performance for the hydrogen evolution reaction, and biosensing with high sensitivity have been achieved [46]. A 1T-phase WS2 exhibited a highly sensitive and selective H2O2 biosensor with a wide range and low detection limits. Furthermore, the detection of three types of hormones (i.e., T3, T4, and PTH) was successfully demonstrated using 1T-phase MoS2 on a polyimide-based flexible substrate [47]. Biosensing through atomic phase structure engineering has great potential, but stable phase structure transformation and stability thereof are still in the development level. (Fig. 4)
Fig. 4.
Types of wearable device package technologies and signal interconnections. a Fully soft package. Reproduced from Ref. [51] with permission. b Rigid components integrated on soft substrate. Reproduced from Ref. [56] with permission. c Rigid substrate covered with soft material. Reproduced from Ref. [57] with permission. d Interconnection implemented using serpentine metal structures. Reproduced from Ref. [54] with permission. e Kirigami structure. Reproduced from Ref. [62] with permission
Packaging
Packaging wearable sensor devices using mechanically flexible materials is crucial for achieving a long device lifetime, reliable health signal acquisition, and comfortable patient experience. The outlying package material should be able to support the integration of electronic elements. To achieve a comfortable, noninvasive wearable device for healthcare monitoring, the device should impose minimal restraint on the natural motion of the body. An application-specific design approach should be considered, depending on the functional requirements.
Strategies to integrate flexible, stretchable, and soft devices with electronic components can be primarily categorized into three types: fully soft, rigid components integrated on a soft substrate, and rigid substrates covered with a soft material. A fully soft package is inspired by the epidermal patch-type device, which comprises stretchable substrates with an elastic modulus similar to that of skin and exhibit conformal contact [48–51]. In the first soft wearable device, silicone-based materials (PDMS, Ecoflex, Solaris, etc.) were used as the substrate, and the electrodes for biomedical measurements were integrated into the wearable device [48]. With the development of technology, other materials that can be used as a supporting material or passivation layer such as poly(vinyl alcohol) films [52], PET [53], parylene [49], and polyimide [54] have been investigated. However, a fully soft device is limited in terms of circuitry integration, signal processing, power delivery, and wireless communication. The second approach, i.e., integrating rigid components on a soft substrate material, can support simple integrated circuits (ICs) with a certain degree of softness and flexibility [52, 55, 56]. This method involves the integration of commercial components or custom-designed ICs on stretchable metal interconnections of soft, flexible substrates. Although this approach can only support simple ICs and basic routing techniques, it provides more functionalities than a fully soft device. As the third strategy, a highly integrated printed circuit board is employed, where complex multifunctional ICs are packaged together with the electrodes using a polymeric material [57, 58]. Even though the rigid platform does not provide as much comfort as the epidermal patch, it can support advanced circuit functions such as high resolution, multifunctional signal processing, and high-speed wireless communication with reliability.
Additionally, metals that form a skin–electronic interface and signal interconnection should be considered. Gold and platinum are widely used as electrode contact materials owing to their biocompatibility and chemical inertness [48]. Copper is frequently used as a signal interconnect and antenna material owing to its low cost and low electrical resistivity characteristics [59]. To support flexible and soft substrates, these metal materials are designed as meandered, serpentine interconnects [60] as well as kirigami structures [61, 62] to endure mechanical stress.
Conclusions
In summary, we presented a comprehensive review of recent research progress pertaining to electrode development, classified into three categories: (1) homogeneous and composite materials, (2) structural aspects, and (3) packaging technologies.
First, (1) regarding the electrode materials aspect, the development of electrodes composed of homogeneous materials has been sufficiently progressed, in which has categorized into dry and wet electrodes. However, there are pros and cons for each of the dry and wet electrodes. In the case of the wet type, the electrode can be well-attached to human skin by using a conductive paste or gel, but it shows limitations in terms of biomedical aspects due to inconvenience of wetting on the body. On the other hand, the dry type has little physical discomfort, but it is difficult to accurately record biosignals owing to high impedance coming from the electrode, so technologies that complement those two issue are required.
Second, (2) regarding the electrode structure aspect, many progresses are intensively being conducted with the advancement of the electrode structure as exampled: microneedles, porous surfaces, nanomeshes, and atomic phase structure. However, it is still necessary to improve stability and reproducibility in the presented structures. Along with the verification of a new structure, tests for reproducibility and robustness should be accompanied. In addition, combining both comfort and adhesion that can be attached to the skin with higher compatibility is desirable, which enables effectively transmit human signals without noise.
Third, (3) regarding the packaging aspect, recent advances in the system packaging technology have demonstrated that soft electronic devices can be a perfect candidate for various wearable biomedical applications. Systems implemented on fully flexible soft material can provide patients with comfort, but hard circuit boards serve as a promising solution for high performance wearable systems. Hence, the researcher should thoroughly characterize the properties of the system prior to implementation and choose the solution that best fits the application. Packaging techniques are still developing with newly engineered materials and thorough clinical verification is necessary for practical realization. Interdisciplinary cooperation among researchers in material science, clinical medicine and engineering is important for commercialization and large-scale clinical studies are necessary.
To attain higher sensing performances in a practical system level compared with those of conventional electrode-based sensors, comprehensive effort should be made; co-development approach of material, structure, and packaging technology aspects lead to conformal contact between electrodes and the human skin such that the impedance of the skin can be reduced as well as offer new opportunities for realizing next-generation biomedical devices.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.NRF-2020M3A9E4104385).
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Eun Kwang Lee and Ratul Kumar Baruah equally contributed to this work.
Contributor Information
Young-Joon Kim, Email: youngkim@gachon.ac.kr.
Hocheon Yoo, Email: hyoo@gachon.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Steinhubl SR, Muse ED, Topol EJ. The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(283):283rv3-rv3. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gomez R, Harrison A, Beyond W. Experiences and Trends in Design of Portable Medical Devices, Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design Practice, 2014, 261–72.
- 3.Trung TQ, Lee N-E. Flexible and Stretchable Physical Sensor Integrated Platforms for Wearable Human-Activity Monitoring and Personal Healthcare. Adv Mater. 2016;28(22):4338–72. doi: 10.1002/adma.201504244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Latest global cancer data: Cancer burden rises to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018. In: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2018. https://www.who.int/cancer/PRGlobocanFinal.pdf Accessed 18 Feb 2021.
- 5.Sackmann EK, Fulton AL, Beebe DJ. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature. 2014;507(7491):181–9. doi: 10.1038/nature13118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bronzino JD. The Biomedical Engineering Handbook Third Edition Medical Devices and Systems. Hartford. Conneciticut: CRC Taylor & Francis; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhou W, Song R, Pan X, Peng Y, Qi X, Peng J, Hui KS, Hui KN. Fabrication and impedance measurement of novel metal dry bioelectrode. Sen Actuato A: Physi. 2013;201:127–33. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Baek J-Y, An J-H, Choi J-M, Park K-S, Lee S-H. Flexible polymeric dry electrodes for the long-term monitoring of ECG. Sen Actuato A: Physi. 2008;143(2):423–9. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Meng Y, Li ZB, Chen X, Chen JP. A flexible dry micro-dome electrode for ECG monitoring. Microsyst Technol. 2014;21(6):1241–8. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jung H-C, Moon J-H, Baek D-H, Lee J-H, Choi Y-Y, Hong J-S, Lee S-H. CNT/PDMS Composite Flexible Dry Electrodesfor Long-Term ECG Monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2012;59(5):1472–9. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2190288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ludwig KA, Langhals NB, Joseph MD, Richardson-Burns SM, Hendricks JL, Kipke DR. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) polymer coatings facilitate smaller neural recording electrodes. J Neural Eng. 2011;8(1):014001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/1/014001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bokobza L. Multiwall carbon nanotube elastomeric composites: A review. Polymer. 2007;48(17):4907–20. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chlaihawi AA, Narakathu BB, Emamian S, Bazuin BJ, Atashbar MZ. Multiwall carbon nanotube elastomeric composites: A review. Polymer. 2018;48(20):9–15. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chlaihawi AA, Narakathu BB, Emamian S, Eshkeiti A, Reddy SGA, Bazuin BJ, Atashbar MZ. Development of flexible dry ECG electrodes based on MWCNT/PDMS composite, 2015 IEEE SENSORS, 2015, 1–4.
- 15.Sánchez S, Pumera M, Cabruja E, Fàbregas E. Carbon nanotube /polysulfone composite screen-printed electrochemical enzyme biosensors. Analyst. 2006;132(2):142–7. doi: 10.1039/b609137g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fu Y, Zhao J, Dong Y, Wang X. Dry Electrodes for Human Bioelectrical Signal Monitoring. Sensors. 2020;20(13):3651. doi: 10.3390/s20133651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Barrau S, Demont P, Peigney A, Laurent C, Lacabanne C. DC and AC Conductivity of Carbon Nanotubes – Polyepoxy Composites. Macromolecules. 2003;36(14):5187–94. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Junyong L, Miao L, Bermak A, Yi-Kuen L, Study of piezoresistance effect of carbon nanotube-PDMS composite materials for nanosensors, 2007 7th IEEE Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE NANO), 2007, 1240-3.
- 19.Kayser LV, Lipomi DJ. Stretchable Conductive Polymers and Composites Based on PEDOT and PEDOT:PSS. Adv Mater. 2019;31(10):1806133. doi: 10.1002/adma.201806133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Khan S, Lorenzelli L, Dahiya RS, Bendable piezoresistive sensors by screen printing MWCNT/PDMS composites on flexible substrates, 2014 10th Conference on Ph.D. Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PRIME), 2014, 1–4.
- 21.Lee J-B, Khang D-Y. Electrical and mechanical characterization of stretchable multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polydimethylsiloxane elastomeric composite conductors. Compos Sci Technol. 2012;72(11):1257–63. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu C-X, Choi J-W. Patterning conductive PDMS nanocomposite in an elastomer using microcontact printing. J Micromech Microeng. 2009;19(8):085019. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Composites Part AA, Science, ManufacturingMa P-C, Siddiqui NA, Marom G, Kim J-K. Dispersion and functionalization of carbon nanotubes for polymer-based nanocomposites: A review. Composites Part A. 2010;41(10):1345–67. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ren L, Jiang Q, Chen Z, Chen K, Xu S, Gao J, Jiang L. Flexible microneedle array electrode using magnetorheological drawing lithography for bio-signal monitoring. Sen Actuato A: Physi. 2017;268:38–45. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ren L, Jiang Q, Chen K, Chen Z, Pan C, Jiang L. Fabrication of a Micro-Needle Array Electrode by Thermal Drawing for Bio-Signals Monitoring. Sensors. 2016;16(6):908. doi: 10.3390/s16060908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Srivastava AK, Bhartia B, Mukhopadhyay K, Sharma A. Long term biopotential recording by body conformable photolithography fabricated low cost polymeric microneedle arrays. Sen Actuato A: Physi. 2015;236:164–72. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Caliò A, Dardano P, Palma VD, Bevilacqua MF, Matteo AD, Iuele H, Stefano LD. Polymeric microneedles based enzymatic electrodes for electrochemical biosensing of glucose and lactic acid. Sens Actuators B. 2016;236:343–9. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee K, Lee HC, Lee DS, Jung H. Drawing Lithography: Three-Dimensional Fabrication of an Ultrahigh‐Aspect‐Ratio Microneedle. Adv Mater. 2010;22(4):483–6. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Aoyagi S, Izumi H, Isono Y, Fukuda M, Ogawa H. Laser fabrication of high aspect ratio thin holes on biodegradable polymer and its application to a microneedle. Sen Actuato A: Physi. 2007;139(1–2):293–302. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nejad HR, Sadeqi A, Kiaee G, Sonkusale S. Low-cost and cleanroom-free fabrication of microneedles. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2018;4(1):17073. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trautmann A, Roth G-L, Nujiqi B, Walther T, Hellmann R. Towards a versatile point-of-care system combining femtosecond laser generated microfluidic channels and direct laser written microneedle arrays. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2019;5(1):6. doi: 10.1038/s41378-019-0046-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Krieger KJ, Bertollo N, Dangol M, Sheridan JT, Lowery MM, O’Cearbhaill ED. Simple and customizable method for fabrication of high-aspect ratio microneedle molds using low-cost 3D printing. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2019;5(1):42. doi: 10.1038/s41378-019-0088-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wu M, Zhang Y, Huang H, Li J, Liu H, Guo Z, Xue L, Liu S, Lei Y. Assisted 3D printing of microneedle patches for minimally invasive glucose control in diabetes. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;117:111299. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Han D, Morde RS, Mariani S, Mattina AAL, Vignali E, Yang C, Barillaro G, Lee H. 4D Printing of a Bioinspired Microneedle Array with Backward-Facing Barbs for Enhanced Tissue Adhesion. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(11):1909197. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lim SH, Kathuria H, Amir MHB, Zhang X, Duong HTT, Paul H, Kang L. High resolution photopolymer for 3D printing of personalised microneedle for transdermal delivery of anti-wrinkle small peptide. J Controll Release. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 36.Sun Y, Ren L, Jiang L, Tang Y, Liu B. Fabrication of Composite Microneedle Array Electrode for Temperature and Bio-Signal Monitoring. Sensors. 2018;18(4):1193. doi: 10.3390/s18041193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gowers SAN, Freeman DME, Rawson TM, Rogers ML, Wilson RC, Holmes AH, Cass AE, O’Hare D. Development of a Minimally Invasive Microneedle-Based Sensor for Continuous Monitoring of β-Lactam Antibiotic Concentrations in Vivo. ACS Sensors. 2019;4(4):1072–80. doi: 10.1021/acssensors.9b00288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang E, Xie Y, Ci S, Jia J, Wen Z. Porous Co3O4 hollow nanododecahedra for nonenzymatic glucose biosensor and biofuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;81:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2016.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Baghayeri M, Veisi H. Fabrication of a facile electrochemical biosensor for hydrogen peroxide using efficient catalysis of hemoglobin on the porous Pd@Fe3O4-MWCNT nanocomposite. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;74:190–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Liu J, Wang X, Wang T, Li D, Xi F, Wang J, Wang E. Functionalization of Monolithic and Porous Three-Dimensional Graphene by One-Step Chitosan Electrodeposition for Enzymatic Biosensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(22):19997–20002. doi: 10.1021/am505547f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cui C, Wang X, Yi Z, Yang B, Wang X, Chen X, Liu J, Yang C. Flexible Single-Electrode Triboelectric Nanogenerator and Body Moving Sensor Based on Porous Na 2 CO 3 /Polydimethylsiloxane Film. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(4):3652–9. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b17585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bai J, Zhong X, Jiang S, Huang Y, Duan X. Graphene nanomesh. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5(3):190–4. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2010.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yun T, Jin HM, Kim DH, Han KH, Yang GG, Lee GY, Lee GS, Choi JY, Kim ID, Kim SO. 2D Metal Chalcogenide Nanopatterns by Block Copolymer Lithography. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(50):1804508. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yang Y, Yang X, Zou X, Wu S, Wan D, Cao A, Liao L, Yuan Q, Duan X. Ultrafine Graphene Nanomesh with Large On/Off Ratio for High-Performance Flexible Biosensors. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(19):1604096. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zribi B, Castro-Arias J-M, Decanini D, Gogneau N, Dragoe D, Cattoni A, Ouerghi A, Korri-Youssoufi H, Haghiri-Gosnet A-M. Large area graphene nanomesh: an artificial platform for edge-electrochemical biosensing at the sub-attomolar level. Nanoscale. 2016;8(34):15479–85. doi: 10.1039/c6nr04289a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Toh RJ, Mayorga-Martinez CC, Sofer Z, Pumera M. 1T‐Phase WS2 Protein‐Based Biosensor. Adv Funct Mater. 2017;27(5):1604923. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kim H-U, Kim HY, Seok H, Kanade V, Yoo H, Park K-Y, Lee J-H, Lee M-H, Kim T. Flexible MoS 2 –Polyimide Electrode for Electrochemical Biosensors and Their Applications for the Highly Sensitive Quantification of Endocrine Hormones: PTH, T3, and T4. Anal Chem. 2020;92(9):6327–33. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim DH, Lu N, Ma R, Kim YS, Kim RH, Wang S, Wu J, Won SM, Tao H, Islam A, Yu KJ, Kim TI, Chowdhury R, Ying M, Xu L, Li M, Chung HJ, Keum H, McCormick M, Liu P, Zhang YW, Omenetto FG, Huang Y, Coleman T, Rogers JA. Epidermal electronics. Science. 2011;333(6044):838–43. doi: 10.1126/science.1206157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yokota T, Zalar P, Kaltenbrunner M, Jinno H, Matsuhisa N, Kitanosako H, Tachibana Y, Yukita W, Koizumi M, Someya T. Ultraflexible organic photonic skin. Sci Adv. 2016;2(4):e1501856. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Norton JJS, Lee DS, Lee JW, Lee W, Kwon O, Won P, Jung S-Y, Cheng H, Jeong J-W, Akce A, Umunna S, Na I, Kwon YH, Wang X-Q, Liu Z, Paik U, Huang Y, Bretl T, Yeo W-H, Rogers JA. Soft, curved electrode systems capable of integration on the auricle as a persistent brain–computer interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(13):3920–5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1424875112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhu C, Chortos A, Wang Y, Pfattner R, Lei T, Hinckley AC, Pochorovski I, Yan X, To JWF, Oh JY, Tok JBH, Bao Z, Murmann B. Stretchable temperature-sensing circuits with strain suppression based on carbon nanotube transistors. Nat Electron. 2018;1(3):183–90. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang X, Yeo WH, Liu Y, Rogers JA. Epidermal differential impedance sensor for conformal skin hydration monitoring. Biointerphases. 2012;7(1–4):52. doi: 10.1007/s13758-012-0052-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jeong JW, McCall JG, Shin G, Zhang Y, Al-Hasani R, Kim M, Li S, Sim JY, Jang KI, Shi Y, Hong DY, Liu Y, Schmitz GP, Xia L, He Z, Gamble P, Ray WZ, Huang Y, Bruchas MR, Rogers JA. Wireless Optofluidic Systems for Programmable In Vivo Pharmacology and Optogenetics. Cell. 2015;162(3):662–74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Webb RC, Bonifas AP, Behnaz A, Zhang Y, Yu KJ, Cheng H, Shi M, Bian Z, Liu Z, Kim YS, Yeo WH, Park JS, Song J, Li Y, Huang Y, Gorbach AM, Rogers JA. Ultrathin conformal devices for precise and continuous thermal characterization of human skin. Nat Mater. 2013;12(10):938–44. doi: 10.1038/nmat3755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Gutruf P, Yin RT, Lee KB, Ausra J, Brennan JA, Qiao Y, Xie Z, Peralta R, Talarico O, Murillo A, Chen SW, Leshock JP, Haney CR, Waters EA, Zhang C, Luan H, Huang Y, Trachiotis G, Efimov IR, Rogers JA. Wireless, battery-free, fully implantable multimodal and multisite pacemakers for applications in small animal models. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5742. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13637-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kim SB, Lee K, Raj MS, Lee B, Reeder JT, Koo J, Hourlier-Fargette A, Bandodkar AJ, Won SM, Sekine Y, Choi J, Zhang Y, Yoon J, Kim BH, Yun Y, Lee S, Shin J, Kim J, Ghaffari R, Rogers JA. Soft, Skin‐Interfaced Microfluidic Systems with Wireless, Battery‐Free Electronics for Digital, Real‐Time Tracking of Sweat Loss and Electrolyte Composition. Small. 2018;14(45):1802876. doi: 10.1002/smll.201802876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gao W, Emaminejad S, Nyein HYY, Challa S, Chen K, Peck A, Fahad HM, Ota H, Shiraki H, Kiriya D, Lien DH, Brooks GA, Davis RW, Javey A. Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature. 2016;529(7587):509–14. doi: 10.1038/nature16521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee K, Ni X, Lee JY, Arafa H, Pe DJ, Xu S, Avila R, Irie M, Lee JH, Easterlin RL, Kim DH, Chung HU, Olabisi OO, Getaneh S, Chung E, Hill M, Bell J, Jang H, Liu C, Park JB, Kim J, Kim SB, Mehta S, Pharr M, Tzavelis A, Reeder JT, Huang I, Deng Y, Xie Z, Davies CR, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Mechano-acoustic sensing of physiological processes and body motions via a soft wireless device placed at the suprasternal notch. Nat Biomed Eng. 2020;4(2):148–58. doi: 10.1038/s41551-019-0480-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Xu S, Zhang Y, Jia L, Mathewson KE, Jang KI, Kim J, Fu H, Huang X, Chava P, Wang R, Bhole S, Wang L, Na YJ, Guan Y, Flavin M, Han Z, Huang Y, Rogers JA. Soft microfluidic assemblies of sensors, circuits, and radios for the skin. Science. 2014;344(6179):70–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1250169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Xu S, Zhang Y, Cho J, Lee J, Huang X, Jia L, Fan JA, Su Y, Su J, Zhang H, Cheng H, Lu B, Yu C, Chuang C, Kim TI, Song T, Shigeta K, Kang S, Dagdeviren C, Petrov I, Braun PV, Huang Y, Paik U, Rogers JA. Stretchable batteries with self-similar serpentine interconnects and integrated wireless recharging systems. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):1543. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhang Y, Yan Z, Nan K, Xiao D, Liu Y, Luan H, Fu H, Wang X, Yang Q, Wang J, Ren W, Si H, Liu F, Yang L, Li H, Wang J, Guo X, Luo H, Wang L, Huang Y, Rogers JA. A mechanically driven form of Kirigami as a route to 3D mesostructures in micro/nanomembranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(38):11757–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515602112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Morikawa Y, Yamagiwa S, Sawahata H, Numano R, Koida K, Ishida M, Kawano T. Ultrastretchable Kirigami Bioprobes. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2018;7(3):1701100. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




