Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 13;7(4):658–670. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c01699

Table 2. Summary of All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulation Resultsa.

mutation hydrophobicity or charge bending/deg twisting/deg assemble cylinder binding energy (kcal/mol)
native positive charge 0.4 10 Y –11 ± 2
R79K positive charge 24 7 Y –11 ± 2
R79D negative charge detach detach N N/A
R79E negative charge detach detach N N/A
R79Q hydrophilic (5.65) detach detach N N/A
R79N hydrophilic 25 4.8 N N/A
R79S hydrophilic 24 48 N N/A
R79T hydrophilic 30 19 N N/A
R79Y hydrophilic 12 15 Y N/A
R79C hydrophilic –15 12 N N/A
R79A hydrophobic 8 35 N N/A
R79P hydrophobic –2 71 N –15 ± 2
R79L hydrophobic 11 20 Y N/A
R79F hydrophobic 16 5 Y N/A
R79W hydrophobic 8 27 Y –17 ± 2
a

Negative bending angles indicate bending towards the outside of PduA. In the binding energy column, negative values correspond to attractive interactions.