Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;218(7):e20210223. doi: 10.1084/jem.20210223

Figure S4.

Figure S4.

Gene expression signatures of young and old HSCs and further characterization of transplanted mice. (A) RNA sequencing analyses of HSCs isolated from young and old controls and (3/24) pairs with gene-set enrichment analyses showing the top 10 differentially expressed pathways in the indicated comparisons. Gray indicates pathways enriched in Y HSCs and black in O HSCs, with bold highlighting common pathways. NES, normalized enrichment score with FDR–adjusted P values. (B) Percentage of old B6 BM cells in the indicated populations in young BJ Het parabionts 4.5 mo after separation. CMP, common myeloid progenitor; GMP, granulocyte/macrophage progenitor; MEP, megakaryocyte/erythrocyte progenitor. (C) Lineage distribution at 4 mo after transplantation in blood (left) and BM (right) for the parabiosis separation transplantation experiment shown in Fig. 8 E. (D) Lineage distribution in blood at 2 mo (left) and 4 mo (right) after transplantation for the heterochronic transplantation experiment shown in Fig. 8 G. O/O samples were excluded from this analysis due to failed engraftment. (E) Donor chimerism in HSC/MPP compartments after heterochronic transplantations. SRP, signal recognition particle; UTR, untranslated region. Data are means ± SD; *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001.