Skip to main content
. 2021 May 14;21(10):3439. doi: 10.3390/s21103439

Table 2.

Summary of papers with the classification of cognitive states.

Ref. Year Cognitive States Best Performing Models No. of Subjects (Female/ Male) Stimulus Data
[39] 2016 Confusion RF, sensitivity 0.61, specificity 0.926 136 (75F/61M) Data visualization software Self-report, ET (with pupillometry), clicks
[36] 2016 Mental workload, attention LDA, accuracy: 92% mental workload and 86% attention 12 (3F/9M) Virtual maze game Self-report, EEG, keyboard, and touch behavior
[22] 2016 Mental stress RF, click-level user-dependent f1-score 0.66; logistic classifier, session-level user-independent f1-score 0.79 20 (7F/13M) Arithmetic questions software ET (from video), clicks
[35] 2016 Engagement SVM, f1-score 0.82 10 (3F/7M), 10 (3F/7M), 130 (34F/96M) Cell phone usage 1st and 2nd studies: EEG and usage logs; 3rd study: usage logs, context, and demographic data
[34] 2018 Mental workload MLP, accuracy 93.7% 61 (19F/42M) Website browsing EDA, Photoplethysmography (PPG), temperature, ECG, EEG, ET (with pupillometry)
[37] 2019 Confusion RF, accuracy range 72.6–99.1% 29 (14F/15M) Personal data sheets ET, age, gender
[40] 2019 Engagement (as a basis for interest detection) kNN (k-Nearest Neighbors), average accuracy 80.3% 4 (2F/2M) Videos Self-report, EEG