Table 24.
Consensus ranking calculations using MAH-FShannon
| Supplier | S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | S9 | S10 | S11 | S12 | Pi | Pi − Ni | Rank (Pi − Ni) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 15 | −3 | 7 |
| S2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 33 | 33 | 1 |
| S3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 27 | 21 | 2 |
| S4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 9 | 6 |
| S5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | −5 | 8 |
| S6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | −13 | 9 |
| S7 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 25 | −7 | 3 |
| S8 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 11 | 4 |
| S9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 | −21 | 10 |
| S10 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 22 | 11 | 4 |
| S11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | −27 | 11 |
| S12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | −33 | 12 |
| Ni | 18 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 19 | 23 | 8 | 11 | 27 | 11 | 30 | 33 |