. 2021 May 17;10(5):792. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050792

Table 5.

Antioxidant properties of the tested extracts.

Species	Parts	Methods	DPPH	ABTS	CUPRAC	FRAP	MCA	PDB
Species	Parts	Methods	(mg TE/g)				(mg EDTAE/g)	mmol TE/g
J. curcas	Leaves	HAE	124.70 ± 0.43 ^a	149.12 ± 7.38 ^a	256.21 ± 2.10 ^a	97.03 ± 1.05 ^a	10.98 ± 1.38 ^a	2.57 ± 0.14 ^b
	Leaves	MAC	76.65 ± 0.95 ^b	107.81 ± 1.38 ^b	193.38 ± 0.66 ^b	70.39 ± 0.22 ^b	10.64 ± 0.81 ^a	2.27 ± 0.12 ^b
	Stem bark	HAE	6.89 ± 0.81 ^c	20.20 ± 1.18 ^c	24.90 ± 0.07 ^c	15.19 ± 0.47 ^c	5.28 ± 0.46 ^b	3.34 ± 0.35 ^a
	Stem bark	MAC	7.00 ± 0.20 ^c	21.03 ± 1.33 ^c	21.07 ± 0.32 ^d	14.02 ± 0.18 ^c	3.21 ± 0.27 ^b	3.55 ± 0.16 ^a
J. gossypifolia	Leaves	HAE	123.88 ± 1.05 ^b	160.00 ± 1.62 ^b	265.79 ± 0.59 ^b	109.45 ± 1.43 ^c	17.51 ± 0.71 ^b	2.44 ± 0.11 ^a
	Leaves	MAC	124.29 ± 4.28 ^b	149.65 ± 1.22 ^c	245.10 ± 1.44 ^c	101.32 ± 0.83 ^d	18.98 ± 0.08 ^a	2.01 ± 0.17 ^b
	Stem bark	HAE	193.93 ± 0.23 ^a	255.39 ± 3.00 ^a	333.30 ± 5.32 ^a	168.93 ± 1.17 ^a	15.91 ± 0.15 ^c	2.12 ± 0.09 ^ab
	Stem bark	MAC	48.14 ± 0.12 ^c	86.88 ± 0.96 ^d	243.59 ± 1.64 ^c	124.18 ± 1.38 ^b	13.67 ± 0.65 ^d	1.76 ± 0.18 ^b

Values are reported as mean ± SD. TE: Trolox equivalent; EDTAE: EDTA equivalent; MCA: metal chelating activity; MAC: maceration; HAE: homogenizer assisted extraction. Different letters in same column indicate significant differences in the tested extracts of each species (p < 0.05).