Skip to main content
. 2021 May 14;13(10):1574. doi: 10.3390/polym13101574

Table 3.

Mean values of melting peak temperature Tm, melting enthalpy ∆Hm, crystallization peak temperature Tc, and crystallization enthalpy ∆Hc derived from DSC. Subscript numbers 1 and 2 indicate first and second peak observed in a given heating or cooling scan.

Tm1 ∆Hm1 Tm2 ∆Hm2 Tc1 ∆Hc1 Tc2 ∆Hc2
°C J/g °C J/g °C J/g °C J/g
rPE-A 132.5 176.6 162.5 4.0 117.5 181.0 1 - -
rPE-C 131.9 177.7 160.4 3.7 118.2 181.5 1 - -
rPE-D 131.3 201.4 - - 117.8 202.0 - -
rPE-E1 131.3 173.1 159.0 2.6 117.7 177.7 1 - -
rPE-E2 131.0 179.1 - - 117.7 181.1 - -
rPE-F 131.5 190.8 - - 118.1 189.2 - -
rPP-A 126.1 4.5 164.0 70.7 123.6 88.7 2 (79.2) 3 115.2 (9.5) 3
rPP-C 124.4 1.2 162.6 74.4 124.9 85.7 2 110.3 -
rPP-D 124.5 2.1 158.9 56.7 122.1 77.9 2 110.8 -
rPP-F 126.8 12.2 161.8 59.8 123.1 83.4 2 (66.6) 3 115.8 (16.8) 3

1 Numbers refer to entire exothermal enthalpy change, including crystallization of minor PP fraction. 2 Numbers refer to entire exothermal enthalpy change, including a small amount from crystallization of minor PE fraction. 3 Numbers in brackets are derived from splitting overlapping peaks at 119 °C. Value thus obtained for ∆Hc1 of PP fraction is likely underestimated, while ∆Hc2 of PE fraction is likely overestimated.