Skip to main content
. 2021 May 17;8(5):68. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering8050068

Table 1.

Comparison of single-use bioreactor systems for stem cell culture. Working volume ranges indicate a change in volume during the culture. Final cell densities presented are the maximum average obtained among different conditions and/or donors: hESC—human embryonic stem cell; hHSPC—human haematopoietic stem/progenitor cell; hiPSC—human induced pluripotent stem cell; hMSC—human mesenchymal stromal cell; hNSC—human neural stem cell; RBC—red blood cell.

Bioreactor Type Cell Type Working Volume/Area Culture Time (days) Maximum Final Cell Density Ref.
Stirred tank hiPSCs 125 mL 7 (2.9 ± 0.3) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [29]
1.0-1.5 L 7 (1.99 ± 0.09) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [30]
hMSCs 15 mL 8 8.1 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [31]
100–200 mL 10 1.8 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [32]
1.0–2.0 L 7 4.1 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [33]
2.0 L 7 (2.7 ± 0.2) × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [34]
1.0–2.4 L 14 ~ 1 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [35]
35 L 7 3.1 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [34]
50 L 11 2.6 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [36]
hHSPCs 10 mL 10 1.4 × 10 7 cells∙mL–1 [37]
Fixed bed hMSCs 3 mL 20.8 N/A (1) [38]
14.2 mL 5.6 (2.9 ± 0.1) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [39]
60 mL 7.0 1.75 × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [39]
300 mL 6.9 2.05 × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [39]
500 mL 7 (8.3 ± 1.6) × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [40]
Hollow fibre hESCs 2.1 m2 5 3.4 × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [41]
hiPSCs 2.1 m2 6–7 (3.3 ± 0.4) × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [42]
hNSCs 2.1 m2 7–11 1.5 × 10 5 cells∙cm–2 [43]
hMSCs 2.1 m2 7–9 N/A (2) [44]
2.1 m2 17 ± 6 (4.7 ± 0.6) × 10 3 cells∙cm–2 [45]
2.1 m2 8 ± 2 (8.0 ± 2.5) × 10 3 cells∙cm–2 [46]
2.1 m2 5 (9.8 ± 1.0) × 10 3 cells∙cm–2 [47]
2.1 m2 5 (1.1 ± 0.2) × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [48]
2.1 m2 7.9–9.9 (1.8 ± 0.2) × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [49]
2.1 m2 6 (1.9 ± 0.3) × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [50]
2.1 m2 6 2.9 × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [51]
2.1 m2 6–13 4.7 × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [52]
Rotary cell culture system hNSCs 4 mL 3 ~ 5 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [53]
hMSCs 10 mL 14 N/A (1) [54]
Rotating bed hMSCs 2000 cm2 5 (1.2 ± 0.1) × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [55]
6000 cm2 9 (5.8 ± 0.9) × 10 4 cells∙cm–2 [56]
Rocking motion hESCs 150 mL (3) 4 2.8 × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [57]
400 mL (3) 4 1.4 × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [57]
1.0 L (3) 4 1.3 × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [57]
hMSCs 50–200 mL 100 (1.32 ± 0.09) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [58]
50–600 mL 10 4.4 × 10 4 cells∙mL–1 [59]
50–600 mL 11 2.2 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [60]
hHSPC-RBCs 200 mL–1 L 33 4.5 × 10 12 cells∙mL–1 [61]
Vertical-Wheel hiPSCs 60 mL 80 N/A (1) [62]
60 mL 7 (2.3 ± 0.2) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [63]
60–73 mL 7 (1.79 ± 0.03) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [63]
80 mL 9 (1.21 ± 0.02) × 10 6 cells∙mL–1 [64]
300 mL 8 (8.6 ± 1.5) × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [64]
100 mL 6 (6.3 ± 0.4) × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [65]
100 mL 6 (6.5 ± 0.6) × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [66]
500 mL 6 ~4 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [66]
hMSCs 60 mL 4 1.1 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [67]
60–100 mL 7 (5.3 ± 0.4) × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [68]
60–100 mL 7–11 5.3 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [69]
90–92 mL 5 ~ 6 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [70]
2.2 L 14 ~ 3 × 10 5 cells∙mL–1 [71]

(1) Non-proliferative and/or differentiating cells. (2) The exact cell density achieved is not stated by the authors but is inferred from the text to be around 105 cells∙cm–2. (3) Part of a consecutive passage experiment with increasing scale; overall fold increase of ~280 over 16 days. Individual experiments at each scale with optimised conditions led to better results, but the exact cell density is not indicated in the article.