Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;11(5):1425. doi: 10.3390/ani11051425

Table 3.

Estimates of genetic (above diagonal) and phenotypic (below diagonal) correlations among the yearling ultrasound measurements and carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle.

Trait UIMF UEMA UBFT BFT CW EMA MS YW
UIMF 0.04 (0.07) 0.46 (0.06) 0.11 (0.08) 0.14 (0.07) 0.28 (0.07) 0.78 (0.04) −0.05 (0.07)
UEMA 0.05 (0.01) 0.16 (0.07) −0.09 (0.07) 0.40 (0.06) 0.65 (0.05) −0.07 (0.08) 0.41 (0.05)
UBFT 0.15 (0.01) 0.22 (0.01) 0.63 (0.05) −0.01 (0.07) −0.12 (0.07) 0.14 (0.07) 0.15 (0.07)
BFT 0.07 (0.01) 0.08 (0.02) 0.40 (0.01) 0.07 (0.07) −0.25 (0.07) 0.03 (0.07) −0.05 (0.07)
CW 0.04 (0.01) 0.42 (0.01) 0.15 (0.01) 0.27 (0.02) 0.56 (0.05) 0.17 (0.07) 0.84 (0.02)
EMA 0.09 (0.01) 0.48 (0.01) 0.05 (0.01) 0.01 (0.02) 0.57 (0.01) 0.35 (0.06) 0.43 (0.06)
MS 0.42 (0.01) 0.01 (0.02) 0.08 (0.02) 0.08 (0.02) 0.12 (0.02) 0.24 (0.02) 0.03 (0.07)
YW 0.05 (0.01) 0.51 (0.01) 0.23 (0.01) 0.18 (0.02) 0.78 (0.01) 0.40 (0.01) 0.06 (0.02)

UIMF: Ultrasound intramuscular fat content; UEMA: Ultrasound longissimus muscle area; UBFT: Ultrasound backfat thickness; BFT: Backfat thickness; CW: Carcass weight; EMA: Eye muscle area; MS: Marbling score; YW: Yearling weight. Numbers in parentheses are the standard deviations of posterior densities.