Table 1.
Comparison of the capabilities of existing methods designed to detect differential reactive nucleotides in rRNA molecules
Tool | Reference | Inter-replicate variability? | Noise considered? | Detection level? | False positives: 18S rRNA | False positives: 18S rRNA dataset 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
classSNitch | [28] | ✗ | ✓ | Regional | N/A | N/A |
PARCEL | [29] | ✓ | ✗ | Regional | 61 | N/A |
RASA | [30] | ✓ | ✓ | Regional | 4 | N/A |
deltaSHAPE | [22] | ✗ | ✓ | Regional | 97 | 16 |
StructDiff | [31] | ✗ | ✓ | Regional | N/A | N/A |
dStruct | [32] | ✓ | ✓ | Regional | 3 | 0 |
diffBUM-HMM | This work | ✓ | ✓ | Regional and Nucleotide | 0 | 0 |
The table shows the previously published results of the analyses on the identically DMS-treated yeast rRNA datasets [27, 32] as well as the results from our diffBUM-HMM analysis of these datasets. The column displaying the number of false positives indicates the number of nucleotides that were called differentially modified in DMS chemical probing data