Skip to main content
. 2021 May 26;20:113. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01305-7

Table 2.

HR and 95% CI for the association between changes in TyG index from 2006 to 2010 and cardiovascular diseases and its subtypes

Quartiles of changes in TyG index P for trend
Q1 (< − 0.31) Q2 (− 0.31 to 0.05) Q3 (0.05–0.41) Q4 (≥ 0.41)
CVD
 Case, n (%) 585 (3.75) 594 (3.81) 646 (4.14) 705 (4.52)
 Incidence rate, per 1000 person-y 5.54 (5.11–6.01) 5.65 (5.21–6.12) 6.17 (5.71–6.66) 6.73 (6.25–7.24)
 Model 1 Reference 1.18 (1.06–1.32) 1.26 (1.12–1.42) 1.42 (1.26–1.60)  < 0.0001
 Model 2 Reference 1.17 (1.04–1.30) 1.24 (1.11–1.40) 1.37 (1.21–1.54)  < 0.0001
Stroke
 Case, n (%) 465 (2.98) 473 (3.03) 528 (3.38) 552 (3.54)
 Incidence rate, per 1000 person-y 4.39 (4.01–4.80) 4.48 (4.10–4.91) 5.03 (4.62–5.47) 5.24 (4.82–5.70)
 Model 1 Reference 1.24 (1.08–1.41) 1.27 (1.11–1.47) 1.44 (1.24–1.66)  < 0.0001
 Model 2 Reference 1.22 (1.07–1.40) 1.26 (1.09–1.45) 1.38 (1.19–1.60)  < 0.0001
MI
 Case, n (%) 126 (0.81) 126 (0.81) 128 (0.82) 165 (1.06)
 Incidence rate, per 1000 person-y 1.18 (0.99–1.40) 1.19 (1.00–1.41) 1.21 (1.02–1.44) 1.55 (1.33–1.81)
 Model 1 Reference 1.05 (0.82–1.34) 1.22 (0.95–1.57) 1.41 (1.09–1.82) 0.0050
 Model 2 Reference 1.02 (0.80–1.30) 1.19 (0.93–1.53) 1.36 (1.05–1.76) 0.0115

Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, and TyG index at baseline. Model 2: further adjusted for education, income, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, a history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia, antidiabetic agents, lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensive agents, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein at baseline

CI confidence interval, CVD cardiovascular disease, MI mypcardial infarction, HR hazard ratio, TyG index triglyceride-glucose index