Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):83–86. doi: 10.5935/1984-0063.20200036

Table 1.

Results of validations studies of sleep apps which claim to detect sleep parameters. All comparisons are made with polysomnography8-10.

Sleep App Study Population Exclusion Criteria Study Findings
Sleep Cycle8 - n=25 (22 suspected
OSA, 3 healthy volunteers);
- Age (years) = 8.0 ± 3.6;
- % male = 56.
- Complex genetic or craniofacial disorders. - No correlation with polysomnography in the measurement of total sleep time (CCC 0.22, p=0.36);
- No correlation in the measurement of sleep latency (CCC 0.05, p=0.16);
- No correlation in the detection of sleep cycle stages (data not provided).
MotionX 24/79 - n=78 (all suspected OSA);
- Age (years) = 8.4 ± 4.0;
- % male = 65.
- Conditions affecting motor control or limb movement. - Over-estimated total sleep time by 106 minutes (p<0.0001);
- Over-estimated sleep efficiency by 17% (p<0.0001);
- Over-estimated sleep period time by 16 minutes (p<0.0001).
Sleep Time10 - n=20 (all healthy volunteers);
- Age (years) = 39.5 ± 12.4;
- % male = 60.
- Diagnosed sleep disorder. - No correlation with polysomnography in the measurement of sleep efficiency (p=0.59) or sleep latency (p=0.09);
- Under-estimated light sleep by 27.9% (p<0.0001);
- Over-estimated deep sleep by 11.1% (p<0.0001).

Age expressed as mean ± standard deviation; OSA: Obstructive sleep apnoea; CCC: Concordance correlation co-efficient.