Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;22(10):5311. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105311

Table 1.

Composition of the common-feature pharmacophore hypotheses generated by HipHop algorithm.

Sr. No. Features a Rank b Direct Hit c Partial Hit d Max Fit e
1 RA, RA, HBA, HBA, HYP, HYP 71.08 1111 0000 6
2 RA, RA, HBA, HBA, HYP, HYP 70.28 1111 0000 6
3 RA, RA, HBA, HBA, HYP, HYP 70.28 1111 0000 6
4 RA, RA, HBA, HBA, HYP, HYP 69.48 1111 0000 6
5 RA, HBA, HYP, HYP, HYPA 66.18 1111 0000 5
6 HBA, HYP, HYP, HYPA, HYPA 66.09 1111 0000 5
7 RA, HBA, HYP, HYP, HYPA 66.04 1111 0000 5
8 RA, HBA, HYP, HYP, HYPA 66.00 1111 0000 5
9 RA, RA, HBA, HYP, HYP 65.96 1111 0000 5
10 RA, RA, HBA, HYP, HYP 65.96 1111 0000 5

a Features: RA: ring aromatic; HBA: hydrogen bond acceptor; HYP: hydrophobic; HYPA: hydrophobic aromatic. b Rank: The best hypothesis demonstrates the highest rank. The higher the rank score, the lower the likelihood of chance correlation. c Direct Hit: Value (1) signifies that the training set molecules mapped well to all chemical features of the hypothesis. d Partial Hit: Value (0) signifies that there was no partial mapping of the training set molecules with the hypothesis. e Max Fit: The maximum number of features in the hypothesis.