Table II.
Performance of Truenat MTB-RIF (Truenat Version 1.5) in comparison with comprehensive laboratory reference standards for detection of RIF resistance
| Candidate test | Comprehensive laboratory reference standard | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | S | Total | ||||
| Sensitivity | 0.76 (0.69, 0.82) | |||||
| Truenat | R | 138 | 44 | 182 | Specificity | 0.95 (0.93, 0.96) |
| S | 43 | 788 | 831 | Positive predictive value | 0.76 (0.69, 0.82) | |
| Total | 181 | 832 | 1013 | Negative predictive value | 0.95 (0.93, 0.96) | |
| Positive likelihood ratio | 14.42 (10.69, 19.44) | |||||
| Negative likelihood ratio | 0.25 (0.19, 0.33) | |||||
Truenat in comparison with the cumulative gold standard yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value are 76.2, 94.7, 75.8 and 94.7 per cent, respectively for detection of RIF resistance. R, resistant; S, susceptible