Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov;152(5):482–489. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2557_19

Table II.

Performance of Truenat MTB-RIF (Truenat Version 1.5) in comparison with comprehensive laboratory reference standards for detection of RIF resistance

Candidate test Comprehensive laboratory reference standard

R S Total
Sensitivity 0.76 (0.69, 0.82)
Truenat R 138 44 182 Specificity 0.95 (0.93, 0.96)
S 43 788 831 Positive predictive value 0.76 (0.69, 0.82)
Total 181 832 1013 Negative predictive value 0.95 (0.93, 0.96)
Positive likelihood ratio 14.42 (10.69, 19.44)
Negative likelihood ratio 0.25 (0.19, 0.33)

Truenat in comparison with the cumulative gold standard yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value are 76.2, 94.7, 75.8 and 94.7 per cent, respectively for detection of RIF resistance. R, resistant; S, susceptible