Table 3.
Advantages and limitation of neuroimaging techniques. Adapted from [38].
I Imaging Features for Stroke Diagnostics | CT | MRI |
---|---|---|
Availability in the acute setting (0–6 hours) | ++ | − |
Rapid image acquisition | ++ | + |
Differentiation between acute and chronic ischemia | − | ++ |
Detection of chronic hemorrhage including micro-bleeds | − | + |
Sensitivity to lacunarand posterior fossa infarcts | − | ++ |
Differentiation between acute and chronic ischemia | − | ++ |
Ability to assess causes of subarachnoid and intracerebral hemorrhage whille in the scanner | + | + |
Time for post-processing angiography and perfusión imaging | − | − |
Accessibility for patients with monitors and Ventilators | ++ | − |
Lack of vulnerability to motion artifacts | + | − |
Feasibility and safety for patients with metallic implants (pacemakers, implantable defibrillators) | ++ | − |
Lack of ionizing radiation | − | ++ |
Renal toxicity associated with contrast administration | + | + |
Cost | + | ++ |
(−) none/low,(+) medium, (++) high