Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;9(2):E466–E473. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200102

Table 2:

Burnout frequency and priorities for reform

Reform priorities Group; no. (%) p value
New-to-practice physicians
n = 171
Established physicians
n = 341
Total
n = 513*
Burnout frequency
 Never 4 (2.3) 46 (13.5) 50 (9.7) < 0.001
 A few times a year 46 (26.9) 117 (34.3) 163 (31.8)
 Once a month 35 (20.4) 54 (15.8) 89 (17.4)
 A few times a month 49 (28.6) 54 (15.8) 103 (20.1)
 Once a week 14 (8.1) 20 (5.9) 34 (6.6)
 A few times a week 18 (10.5) 30 (8.8) 48 (9.4)
 Every day 6 (3.5) 20 (5.9) 26 (5.1)
High level of burnout 38 (22.2) 70 (20.5) 108 (21.1) 0.754
Reforms (yes or no)
 Primary care reform is needed 145 (84.7) 254 (74.4) 399 (77.8) 0.009
 An alternative payment model would make it easier to provide longitudinal care 117 (68.4) 136 (39.8) 253 (49.3) < 0.001
 I would prefer to be an employee of a clinic (not a small business owner) 100 (58.5) 144 (42.2) 244 (47.5) 0.001
Specific reform priorities
Payment structure
 Alternative forms of physician payment 109 (63.7) 136 (39.8) 245 (47.8) < 0.001
 Direct funding for team roles 132 (77.2) 210 (61.6) 342 (66.7) < 0.001
 Direct clinic funding 123 (71.9) 184 (53.9) 307 (59.8) < 0.001
Work structure
 Option to practise in a team 143 (83.6) 214 (62.7) 357 (69.6) < 0.001
 Time-limited commitment to patient panel 51 (29.8) 69 (20.2) 120 (23.4) 0.015
 Transparent evaluation of transformation initiatives 100 (58.5) 211 (61.9) 311 (60.6) 0.482
 Option to work part-time 117 (68.4) 215 (63.0) 332 (64.7) 0.214
Job benefits
 Vacation and parental leave 142 (83.1) 274 (80.3) 416 (81.1) 0.425
 Loan forgiveness 68 (39.8) 70 (20.5) 138 (26.9) < 0.001
*

Missing data (n = 12) for all questions.

No. (%) of participants who reported a priority as very important.