Table 2.
Summary of key challenges, points of discussion, and recommendations.
| Challenges |
| • BQ would need to account for heterogenous variables related to language ability, history, and context. |
| • Language exposure, use, and ability change over time, and the relationships among variables vary across populations. |
| • Some language background variables capture qualitative differences that do not clearly index a relative “degree” of bilingualism. |
| Discussion Questions |
| • What would a BQ represent? |
| • Is it possible to operationalize all relevant factors along a continuum of bilingualism? |
| • What criteria and principles could be used to establish a bilingual continuum? |
| Recommendations |
| • Use of large, diverse datasets and advanced statistical methods to select and weight attributes. |
| • Implement flexible methods of administering, weighting, and scoring (e.g., rely on several agreed-upon categories with multiple specific attributes within each to select among). |
| • Variable standards of comparison based on demographic characteristics to determine relative bilingualism. |
| • Include mechanisms for assessing change over time. |
| • Establish norms and procedures for reporting and depositing data. |