Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Psycholinguist. 2020 Nov 11;42(Suppl 2):527–548. doi: 10.1017/s0142716420000533

Table 2.

Summary of key challenges, points of discussion, and recommendations.

Challenges

 • BQ would need to account for heterogenous variables related to language ability, history, and context.
 • Language exposure, use, and ability change over time, and the relationships among variables vary across populations.
 • Some language background variables capture qualitative differences that do not clearly index a relative “degree” of bilingualism.

Discussion Questions

 • What would a BQ represent?
 • Is it possible to operationalize all relevant factors along a continuum of bilingualism?
 • What criteria and principles could be used to establish a bilingual continuum?

Recommendations

 • Use of large, diverse datasets and advanced statistical methods to select and weight attributes.
 • Implement flexible methods of administering, weighting, and scoring (e.g., rely on several agreed-upon categories with multiple specific attributes within each to select among).
 • Variable standards of comparison based on demographic characteristics to determine relative bilingualism.
 • Include mechanisms for assessing change over time.
 • Establish norms and procedures for reporting and depositing data.