. 2021 May 18;11(5):368. doi: 10.3390/membranes11050368

Table 7.

Results of the simulation for selected models of bergamot juice clarification in terms of RMSE, MAPE, R², and Shapiro–Wilk (S-W) and Kruskal–Wallis (K-W) residual analysis tests. Statistically validated models are in bold.

Models		RMSE	MAPE	R²	S-W	K-W
Concentration polarization model	Davis (1992)/Shear-Induced Diffusion	0.80	11.76	91.08	0.00	0.10365
Osmotic pressure models	Keden & Katchalsky (1958)	0.25	5.70	99.17	0.0117	0.05
Osmotic pressure models	Wijmans et al. (1984)	0.49	11.70	99.22	0.6855	0.0004
Resistance in series models	Hagen-Poiseuille (1839)	0.22	3.99	99.78	0.00034	0.8364
Resistance in series models	De et al. (1997)	0.36	4.81	97.47	0.00	0.8692
Fouling and adsorption models	Ho and Zydney (2000)	1.64	31.52	90.25	1.554 × 10⁻¹⁵	0.00
	Song (1998)/Dynamic model	1.51	35.90	97.56	0.00	0.00
	Mondal et al (2009)	1.76	18.23	87.01	0.0	0.00002
Non-Phenomenological models	Yee et al. (2009)	2.03	28.91	84.91	0.000088	0.1038
Non-Phenomenological models	Ruby-Figueroa et al. (2017)/ARIMA models	0.40	8.24	97.92	2.99 × 10⁻¹⁵	0.056