Table 8.
Results of the simulation for selected models of kiwi juice clarification in terms of RMSE, MAPE, R2, and residual analysis tests Shapiro–Wilk (S-W) and Kruskal–Wallis (K-W). Statistically validated models are in bold.
| Models | RMSE | MAPE | R2 | S-W | K-W | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration polarization models | Davis (1992)/Shear-Induced Diffusion | 2.91 | 22.35 | 52.86 | 0.00 | 1.213 × 10−10 |
| Osmotic pressure models | Keden and Katchalsky (1958) | 9.51 | 115.03 | 97.76 | 0.002 | 0.00 |
| Wijmans et al. (1984) | 0.33 | 3.14 | 97.98 | 0.075 | 0.45 | |
| Resistance in series models | Hagen-Poiseuille (1839) | 0.64 | 8.21 | 98.45 | 0.00 | 0.0032 |
| De et al. (1997) | 0.48 | 5.46 | 97.43 | 0.0012 | 0.2238 | |
| Fouling and adsorption models | Ho and Zydney (2000) | 1.07 | 8.92 | 95.95 | 4.152 × 10−12 | 0.1015 |
| Song (1998)/Dynamic model | 3.94 | 43.51 | 67.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Mondal et al (2009) | 0.96 | 11.17 | 93.18 | 0.0 | 0.058 | |
| Non-Phenomenological models | Yee et al. (2009) | 0.64 | 7.16 | 97.67 | 1.438 × 10−13 | 0.2047 |
| Ruby-Figueroa et al. (2017)/ARIMA models | 0.33 | 3.74 | 98.98 | 0.0250 | 0.3801 | |