Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;24:100620. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100620

Table 9.

Performance of past DenseNet-Based models versus radiologists.

Paper Reviewed F1 ACC COVID-19 Sens.
Yeh et al. [41]
3-class 81.82%
Haghanifar et al. [11]
2-class 94% 98.62%
3-class 85% 81.04%
Mangal et al. [23]
3-class 92.3% 90.5% 100%
Al-Waisy et al. [3]
2-class 99.99% 99.99% 99.98%
Rajaraman et al. [30]
4-class 96.77% 96.83% 96.34%
Radiologists [39]
2-class 81% 70%

Note: Haghanifar et al. [11], Mangal et al. [23], Al-Waisy et al. [3], and Rajaraman et al. [30] all improperly used Kermany et al.’s dataset [18].