Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;9(5):522. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050522

Table 1.

The five steps of the Gender Impact Assessment (GIA) method applied to the COVID-19.

Step 1 To define context, objectives and indicators Context: vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2
Objectives: provide gender-based recommendations for vaccination campaign against SARS-CoV-2
Indicators: antibody titer against Sars-Cov-2 before and after the vaccine; side effects due to the vaccine
Step 2 To explicate the relevance for GIA Gender dynamics: exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and the vaccine access Direct impacts of gender dynamics: access to vaccine
Indirect impacts of gender dynamics: intermediate access to vaccine
Step 3 To identify gender impacts Gender stereotypes: women are considered more suitable for care and assistance jobs
Hierarchical positioning: hospital-based healthcare workers vs informal caregivers and healthcare workers outside hospitals
Unequal condition: access to vaccine for informal caregivers and healthcare workers outside hospitals vs hospital-based healthcare workers
Step 4 To evaluate gender impacts Harmful impacts of gender bias: females working in healthcare are most at-risk for being exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection
Aspects that reduce inequalities: to provide vaccine to all individuals at comparable risk in healthcare
Step 5 To provide recommendations for adjustments Suggestions for reducing inequalities: to include sex-disaggregated reporting of immuno-response and side effects
Development of strategies to transform negative impacts of gender-gap into positive ones: healthcare workers could be included in decision-making regarding the campaign against SARS-CoV-2, taking into account knowledge and experience gained by women in the management of COVID-19