Skip to main content
. 2021 May 11;6(20):13192–13203. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01065

Table 3. Assessment of the Effect of Typical Excipients on the Stability of AmST-MCs and AmT-MCs.

          AUL Ø (μm)
PDI
# MCs (1012 MCs/mL)
stability indexa
entry excipient pH time (h) salinity (ppt) AmST AmT AmST AmT AmST AmT AmST AmT
1 H2O [reference] ∼7     1.44 1.28 0.5 0.5 6.97 6.64 1.00 1.00
2 AE-25b 7 8   1.38 1.47 0.4 0.5 3.76 3.86 0.54 0.85
3 AE-25 7 24   1.50 1.43 0.5 0.4 3.30 3.40 0.47 0.75
4 AE-25 7 48   1.52 1.32 0.4 0.3 3.10 2.37 0.45 0.52
5 AOc 8 8 54 1.39 1.66 0.4 0.5 7.02 3.86 1.0 0.85
6 AO 8 24 54 1.27 1.73 0.3 0.6 6.98 4.07 1.0 0.90
7 AO 8 48 54 1.14 1.59 0.4 0.5 6.99 3.68 1.0 0.81
8 MOPSd ∼7 48 21 1.35 1.61 0.4 0.6 6.93 4.09 0.99 0.90
9 SDSe ∼7 48 29 1.38 1.58 0.3 0.4 5.28 2.50 0.76 0.73
10 glucosef ∼7 48   1.42 1.31 0.5 0.4 6.55 6.17 0.94 0.93
11 starch ∼7 48   1.30 1.40 0.5 0.5 6.60 6.30 0.95 0.90
12 EtOHg   48                  
13 NaCl (aq)h 7 48 9 1.37 1.46 0.4 0.5 3.83 4.98 0.55 0.75
a

Determined as the ratio between the number of capsules before and after exposure to specified conditions.

b

Fatty alcohol ethoxylate.

c

Alkyl amine oxide.

d

3-(N-Morpholino)propanesulfonic acid.

e

Sodium dodecyl sulfate.

f

Physiological solution of glucose (5% w/v).

g

Ethanol.

h

Physiological solution of NaCl (9% w/v).