Table 1. Analytical Performances of the Proposed Method (n = 3).
| analytes | linearity range (mg L–1) | R2 | RSD (%) | LOD (mg L–1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLA | 0.25–26.2 | 0.9989 | 1.3 | 0.008 |
| CA | 0.15–16.3 | 0.9985 | 1.5 | 0.005 |
| FA | 0.21–22.5 | 0.9979 | 1.6 | 0.007 |
| analytes | linearity range (mg L–1) | R2 | RSD (%) | LOD (mg L–1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLA | 0.25–26.2 | 0.9989 | 1.3 | 0.008 |
| CA | 0.15–16.3 | 0.9985 | 1.5 | 0.005 |
| FA | 0.21–22.5 | 0.9979 | 1.6 | 0.007 |