Table 3.
Concurrent multilevel model results.
| Positive mood | Negative mood | Disclosure | Support | PCE-diabetes | PCE-general | Self-care | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.89*** | 1.42*** | 2.40*** | 2.62*** | 2.89*** | 2.87*** | 3.57*** |
| CGM | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | −0.04 | 0.03 |
| Openness | 0.26** | 0.07 | −0.02 | −0.11 | 0.24** | 0.20* | 0.01 |
| Conscientiousness | 0.05 | −0.02 | 0.05 | 0.00 | −0.04 | 0.06 | 0.24** |
| Day | −0.01*** | −0.01*** | −0.02*** | −0.01*** | −0.01* | −0.02*** | 0.00 |
| WI play | 0.12*** | −0.07*** | 0.17*** | 0.16*** | 0.06* | 0.06* | −0.01 |
| BW play | 0.40*** | −0.13* | 0.74*** | 0.84*** | 0.05 | −0.03 | 0.09 |
Note. N = 199; PCE = perceived coping effectiveness; CGM continuous blood glucose monitor; WI = within-person variability; BW = between-person variability. For self-care, analysis indicated that the final Hessian matrix was not positive definite although convergence criteria had been satisfied. We removed the random slope for within-person variability in play and changed the random effect covariance matrix to identity. When this was done, the model converged and ran without errors. Results presented in the table reflect the model without the random slope for within-person variability in play.
p ≤ .10;
p ≤ .05;
p ≤ .01;
p ≤ .001.