Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Pers Relat. 2019 Mar 6;36(11-12):3695–3710. doi: 10.1177/0265407519832115

Table 3.

Concurrent multilevel model results.

Positive mood Negative mood Disclosure Support PCE-diabetes PCE-general Self-care
Intercept 1.89*** 1.42*** 2.40*** 2.62*** 2.89*** 2.87*** 3.57***
CGM −0.02 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.00 −0.04 0.03
Openness 0.26** 0.07 −0.02 −0.11 0.24** 0.20* 0.01
Conscientiousness 0.05 −0.02 0.05 0.00 −0.04 0.06 0.24**
Day −0.01*** −0.01*** −0.02*** −0.01*** −0.01* −0.02*** 0.00
WI play 0.12*** −0.07*** 0.17*** 0.16*** 0.06* 0.06* −0.01
BW play 0.40*** −0.13* 0.74*** 0.84*** 0.05 −0.03 0.09

Note. N = 199; PCE = perceived coping effectiveness; CGM continuous blood glucose monitor; WI = within-person variability; BW = between-person variability. For self-care, analysis indicated that the final Hessian matrix was not positive definite although convergence criteria had been satisfied. We removed the random slope for within-person variability in play and changed the random effect covariance matrix to identity. When this was done, the model converged and ran without errors. Results presented in the table reflect the model without the random slope for within-person variability in play.

+

p ≤ .10;

*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01;

***

p ≤ .001.