Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0251814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251814

Table 3. State wise distribution of PMJAY empanelment by mode of implementation and sector.

State Name Mode of Implementation Public Private
(For Profit)
Private (Not for Profit) Total
Gujarat Hybrid 1817 (68.0%) 765 (28.6%) 90 (3.4%) 2672
Jharkhand Hybrid 274 (36.1%) 425 (56.1%) 59 (7.8%) 758
Maharashtra Hybrid 123 (23.3%) 404 (76.7%) 0 527
Tamil Nadu## Hybrid 1205 (52.1%) 1101 (47.6%) 9 (0.4%) 2315
Dadra & Nagar Haveli Insurance 4 (100.0%) 0 0 4
Daman & Diu Insurance 3 (100.0%) 0 0 3
Jammu & Kashmir Insurance 126 (79.2%) 26 (16.4%) 7 (4.4%) 159
Kerala Insurance 187 (46.6%) 182 (45.4%) 32 (8.0%) 401
Meghalaya Insurance 163 (92.1%) 9 (5.1%) 5 (2.8%) 177
Nagaland Insurance 75 (92.6%) 6 (7.4%) 0 81
Puducherry Insurance 12 (60.0%) 6 (30.0%) 2 (10.0%) 20
Punjab Insurance 241 (33.2%) 415 (57.2%) 69 (9.5%) 725
Andhra Pradesh Trust 225 (32.1%) 477 (67.9%) 0 702
Andaman & Nicobar Trust 3 (100.0%) 0 0 3
Arunachal Pradesh Trust 5 (100.0%) 0 0 5
Assam Trust 160 (53.9%) 117 (39.4%) 20 (6.7%) 297
Bihar Trust 571 (71.3%) 196 (24.5%) 34 (4.2%) 801
Chandigarh Trust 5 (27.8%) 11 (61.1%) 2 (11.1%) 18
Chhattisgarh Trust 714 (75.9%) 227 (24.1%) 0 941
Goa Trust 11 (45.8%) 13 (54.2%) 0 24
Haryana Trust 166 (30.9%) 323 (60.1%) 48 (8.9%) 537
Himachal Pradesh Trust 143 (70.1%) 52 (25.5%) 9 (4.4%) 204
Karnataka Trust 2517 (84.0%) 475 (15.9%) 4 (0.1%) 2996
Lakshadweep Trust 1 (100.0%) (0.0%) 0 1
Madhya Pradesh Trust 411 (77.8%) 92 (17.4%) 25 (4.7%) 528
Manipur Trust 50 (87.7%) 7 (12.3%) 0 57
Mizoram Trust 86 (89.6%) 10 (10.4%) 0 96
Rajasthan Trust 595 (28.4%) 1498 (71.6%) 0 2093
Sikkim Trust 9 (90.0%) 0 1 (10.0%) 10
Tripura Trust 100 (98.0%) 2 (2.0%) 0 102
Uttarakhand Trust 123 (62.8%) 51 (26.0%) 22 (11.2%) 196
Uttar Pradesh Trust 1093 (41.6%) 1245 (47.4%) 289 (11.0%) 2627
Total 11218 (56%) 8135 (41%) 727 (4%) 20080

Note: 177 EHCFs accounting for states not implementing the scheme and empanelled by NHCP not included for analysis.

## Tamil Nadu employs its own information system for empanelment which considers individual departments in individual facilities. Therefore, the total number of ‘empanelled’ facilities is likely lower than what is reported above.

Source: Data from PM-JAY portal [16], compiled by authors