Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;7(5):395. doi: 10.3390/jof7050395

Table 2.

Comparison of specific methods with the respect to efficacy, limitations, and undesirable effects.

NTP EB PL
Generated by electrical discharges high electric field,
kinetic energy of electrons up to several MeV
flash lamps, from IR to UV
Mechanisms generated reactive species electron collisions the mycotoxin structure
reactive species generated in water
powerful short-time pulses of a broad-spectrum light
UV content
local overheating by high peak power
Efficacy up to 100% in vitro
up to 70% in food
long aliphatic chains have less resistance as aromatic rings
up to 99% in water solution
up to 70% in food
lower mycotoxin concentration caused the higher exposed surface of toxins
presence of water leads to higher number of radicals produced
generated free radicals are scavenged by some solvents, e.g., methanol
up to 90%
Limitations laboratory scales only
surface action only
antioxidant substances decreases the effect
laboratory scales only
penetration from several micrometers up to several centimeters depending on the energy
laboratory scales only
deeper penetration for a transparent matrix allowing complete decontamination
for opaque matrix, the effect is limited to the surface
Undesirable effects oxidation of matrix insufficiently explored overheating of matrix