Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;131(11):e147683. doi: 10.1172/JCI147683

Figure 5. CsA inhibits perforin expression more potently in LckWT T cells.

Figure 5

(AC) Freshly isolated liver-infiltrating cells from recipients receiving B6 WT (n = 6), WT + CsA (n = 5), LckS59A (n = 5), or LckS59A + CsA (n = 5) donors were stained for CD107a (A), granzyme B (B), and perforin (C) expression. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry and gated on CD8+. Because of limiting cell numbers, the negative control is TCR-β+–gated splenocytes from mice that received BM only, and is included with the histograms of both WT and LckS59A CD8+ cells. The error bars represent the mean ± SEM. (D) Flow cytometric analysis of perforin staining is shown for CD8+-gated P14 T cells stimulated on anti-CD3 coated plates and soluble anti-CD28 for 48 hours. The graphs show the relative MFIs of perforin expression compared with activated and CsA-untreated CD8+ T cells. The graphs show the mean ± SEM of 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, 2-tailed Student’s t test.