Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 19;21(3):308–317. doi: 10.1038/s41397-021-00210-2

Table 6.

Summary of several studies that explored the prevalence of 2R/2R TYMS genotype.

Author Population N Prevalence N (%)
Zhu Case and control infants (American Caucasians) 78 and 132 16 (21) and 34 (26)
Zhu Case and control infants (American Hispanics) 144 and 396 25 (17) and 70 (18)
De Jonge Children with ALL and matched control (Netherlands) 244 and 491 51 (21) and 116 (24)
Gast Children with ALL and matched control (Germany) 457 and 541 95 (21) and 111 (21)
Lightfoot Children with ALL and matched control (UK) 759 and 754 193 (25) and 181(24)
Petra Children with ALL and matched control (Slovenia) 68 and 252 17 (25) and 76 (30)
Adleff Colorectal (Hungary) 102 18 (17.6)
Kristensen Colorectal (Denmark) 122 34 (28)
Vazquez Healthy volunteers (Argentina) 199 43 (26.1)
Canalle Children with ALL and matched control (Brazil) 126 and 300 33 (26) and 53 (18)
Silva Children with ALL and matched control (Brazil) 140 and 390 25 (18) and 66 (17)
Gallegos-Arreola Colorectal and healthy subjects (Mexico) 347 and 456 77 (22) and 85 (19)
Chan Children with ALL and matched control (Indonesia) 184 and 177 30 (16) and 0 (0)
Giovannetti Children with ALL and matched control (Indonesia) 71 and 44 1 (1) and 0 (0)
Yeoh Children with ALL and matched control (Singapore) 518 and 652 12 (2) and 15 (2)
Nazki Children with ALL and matched control (India) 43 and 144 8 (19) and 14 (10)