Table 6.
Influence of T. asperellum on the antioxidant enzyme activities in the roots of maize seedlings in saline–alkaline soil (± SD).
| Cultivars | Treatment | APX activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteing) | ± Con% | MDHAR activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteing) | ± Con% | DHAR activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteing) | ± Con% | GR activity (U min−1 mg−1 proteing) | ± Con% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XY335 | Con | 25.30 ± 2.34d | – | 43.30 ± 1.83d | – | 52.85 ± 3.56d | – | 3.68 ± 1.40d | – |
| T1 | 33.25 ± 5.37c | 31.42 | 49.52 ± 1.43c | 14.36 | 62.29 ± 2.57c | 17.86 | 4.35 ± 1.25c | 18.21 | |
| T2 | 38.75 ± 2.46b | 53.16 | 53.75 ± 1.06b | 24.13 | 68.72 ± 2.15b | 30.03 | 5.30 ± 2.01b | 44.02 | |
| T3 | 44.28 ± 2.44a | 75.02 | 59.61 ± 1.39a | 37.66 | 74.13 ± 1.78a | 40.26 | 6.48 ± 1.31a | 76.09 | |
| JY417 | Con | 30.47 ± 3.71d | – | 47.20 ± 1.47d | – | 56.66 ± 1.87d | – | 4.95 ± 0.93d | – |
| T1 | 35.67 ± 2.67c | 17.07 | 51.67 ± 1.28c | 9.47 | 64.42 ± 1.62c | 13.70 | 5.34 ± 1.01c | 7.88 | |
| T2 | 42.73 ± 3.70b | 40.24 | 57.39 ± 2.29b | 21.59 | 71.36 ± 1.85b | 25.94 | 6.43 ± 0.67b | 29.90 | |
| T3 | 50.94 ± 5.93a | 67.18 | 63.44 ± 1.92a | 34.41 | 78.73 ± 1.64a | 38.95 | 7.84 ± 0.35a | 58.38 | |
| ANOVA | |||||||||
| C | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
| T | ** | ** | ** | ** | |||||
| C × T | ** | NS | NS | NS |
Con, T1, T2, and T3 indicate 0, 1 × 103, 1 × 106, 1 × 109 spores L−1 suspension, respectively. Antioxidant enzyme activities were measured on the 27th day after T. asperellum application. C and T indicated cultivars and treatments, respectively. Different letters within a column represented significant differences at 5% probability level, and the numerical value was the mean value of five repeats. Differences between treatments were calculated for each particular cultivar. NS, not significant. * and **, significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 probability level, respectively.