Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;11:11174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90599-4

Table 2.

The comparison of different method in lung nodule segmentation.

Evaluation Without pre-processing With pre-processing (mono input positive) With pre-processing (mono input negative)
Dice coefficient 0.573 0.790 0.701
Confusion matrix Accuracy:0.9986 Accuracy:0.9997 Accuracy:0.9997
Sensitivity:0.9033 Sensitivity:0.9614 Sensitivity:0.9724
Specificity:0.9987 Specificity:0.9998 Specificity:0.9997
Evaluation With pre-processing (hybrid positive output) With pre-processing (hybrid negative output)
Dice coefficient 0.744 0.639
Confusion matrix Accuracy:0.9996 Accuracy:0.9994
Sensitivity:0.9502 Sensitivity:0.9650
Specificity:0.9996 Specificity:0.9994