Skip to main content
. 2021 May 27;11:11144. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90472-4

Table 2.

The summary of kinetic properties of the WT PNP and the Y160W mutant vs. natural substrates and vs. 7-methylguanosine.

Kinetic parameter WT Y160W
Model Allostery Eq. (2) Allostery Eq. (2)
Phosphate as variable substrate, 0.4 mM m7Guo
Km [μM] 15 ± 4* 18.7 ± 2.7
Vmax [U/mg] 10.8 ± 0.7* 11.7 ± 0.4
a 267 ± 232* 390 ± 122
b 0.76 ± 0.06* 0.94 ± 0.05
Kinetic parameter WT Y160W
Model Michaelis–Menten Eq. (1) Michaelis–Menten Eq. (1)
Guo as variable substrate, 50 mM phosphate
Km [μM] 28 ± 4 128 ± 2
Vmax [U/mg] 51.1 ± 2.3 42.8 ± 0.3
Kinetic parameter WT Y160W
Model Michaelis–Menten Eq. (1) Michaelis–Menten Eq. (1)
m7Guo as variable substrate, 50 mM phosphate
Km [μM] 27.2* 71.3 ± 3
Vmax [U/mg] 22.7 ± 0.3 21 ± 1
Kinetic parameter WT Y160W
Model Competitive inhibition Eq. (3) Competitive inhibition Eq. (3)
Formycin A (m7Guo as variable substrate, 50 mM phosphate)
Ki [μM] 5.3 ± 0.4 42 ± 4

Data were obtained at pH 7.0, in 50 mM Hepes buffer, at 25 °C, with 50 mM phosphate using spectrophotometric methods described in “Methods” section. Parameters were obtained from the global fitting and are shown together with their standard deviations.

*From 19, 250 μM m7Guo.