Skip to main content
. 2021 May 14;15:650629. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.650629

TABLE 1.

Comparison of the glioma detection performance evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation between the baseline concatenating HOG method and our proposed transformed HOG method.

Dataset Cell size Measurements Our method (SD) Baseline method (SD)
DS-Detect 20 ACC 86.3% (1.4) 76.8% (1.2)
SEN 89.4% (1.9) 84.1% (1.9)
SPE 80.5% (2.5) 63.7% (2.4)
AUC 0.921 (0.007) 0.846 (0.013)