Skip to main content
. 2021 May 14;15:650629. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.650629

TABLE 2.

Comparison of the glioma grading performance evaluated by 10-fold cross-validation between the baseline concatenating HOG method and our proposed transformed HOG method.

Dataset Cell size Measurements Our method (SD) Baseline method (SD)
DS-Grade 18 ACC 76.3% (2.4) 72.0% (2.3)
SEN 83.7% (3.2) 72.5% (3.4)
SPE 68.7% (2.7) 71.6% (2.8)
AUC 0.806 (0.022) 0.777 (0.021)