Skip to main content
. 2021 May 28;2021(5):CD011563. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011563.pub2

Comparison 1. Absorbable tacks compared to nonabsorbable tacks.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1.1 Recurrence (1 year to median 31 months) 2 101 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.74 [0.17, 3.22]
1.2 Pain (VAS 0 ‐ 10, 1 day) 1 51 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.00 [‐0.58, 0.58]
1.3 Pain (VAS 0 ‐ 100, 2 days) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐11.80 [‐27.71, 4.11]
1.4 Pain (VAS 0 ‐ 10, 2 week) 1 51 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.40 [‐0.01, 0.81]
1.5 Pain (VAS 0 ‐ 10, 6 months) 1 51 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.50 [‐0.08, 1.08]
1.6 Seroma (3 days) 1 51 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.23, 2.54]
1.7 Seroma (1 month) 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.62, 2.42]
1.8 Infection (1 month) 1 50 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.20 [0.03, 1.59]
1.9 Length of hospital stay (days) 1 51 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.40 [‐1.19, 0.39]
1.10 Duration of surgery (minutes) 1 51 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.00 [‐27.68, 31.68]